首页|基于COM-B理论的全程化运动管理在稳定期慢性心力衰竭康复患者中的应用

基于COM-B理论的全程化运动管理在稳定期慢性心力衰竭康复患者中的应用

扫码查看
目的 借助远程医疗平台,探讨基于能力、机会、动机-行为(COM-B)理论的全程化运动管理在稳定期慢性心力衰竭患者中的应用效果.方法 基于文献回顾、德尔菲法专家函询等形成基于COM-B理论的全程化运动管理干预方案.选取2023年9月至2024年3月河北省人民医院住院的72例慢性心力衰竭患者为研究对象,通过随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36例)和试验组(36例),对照组给予常规出院运动指导和健康教育,试验组在对照组基础上实施COM-B理论指导下的全程化运动管理干预.于干预前及干预4、12周后,采用左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末内径(LVESD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVEDD)、6分钟步行试验、运动自我效能量表、心力衰竭生活质量问卷进行效果评价.结果 本研究对照组脱落3例,试验组脱落1例.整体分析发现:两组心功能情况组间比较、时间点比较及交互作用差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步两两比较,组内比较:两组干预4周LVEF高于干预前,LVEDD低于干预前,且干预12周LVEF高于干预4周,LVESD、LVEDD低于干预4周(P<0.05);组间比较:干预12周,试验组LVEF高于对照组,LVESD、LVEDD低于对照组(P<0.05).整体分析发现:两组6分钟步行试验组间比较、时间点比较及交互作用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步两两比较,组内比较:干预4周,两组6分钟步行距离高于干预前,且干预12周高于干预4周(P<0.05);组间比较:干预12周,试验组高于同期对照组(P<0.05).整体分析发现:两组运动自我效能组间比较、时间点比较及交互作用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步两两比较,组内比较:干预4周,两组运动自我效能得分高于干预前,且干预12周高于干预4周(P<0.05);组间比较:干预12周,试验组高于对照组(P<0.05).整体分析发现:两组心力衰竭生活质量问卷得分组间(除其他领域外)比较、时间点比较及交互作用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).进一步两两比较,组内比较:干预4周,对照组身体领域、其他领域及总分低于干预前,试验组各维度及总分低于干预前,且干预12周低于干预4周(P<0.05);组间比较:干预12周,试验组低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 基于COM-B理论的全程化运动管理在稳定期慢性心力衰竭康复患者中具有较好的应用效果,可有效改善患者心肺功能,提高运动自我效能,提升生活质量水平.
Application of whole-process exercise management based on COM-B theory in patients recovering from stable chronic heart failure
Objective To explore the application effects of continuous exercise management based on capacity,opportunity,motivation-behavior(COM-B)theory in patients with stable chronic heart failure using a telemedicine platform.Methods A continuous exercise management intervention program based on COM-B theory was formulated through literature review and Delphi expert consultation.Seventy-two patients with chronic heart failure admitted to Hebei Provincial People's Hospital from September 2023 to March 2024 were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into control group(36 cases)and experimental group(36 cases)using a random number table.The control group received conventional discharge exercise guidance and health education,while the experimental group received continuous exercise management intervention guided by COM-B theory in addition to what the control group received.Before the intervention and at 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the intervention,evaluations were conducted using left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVESD),the 6-minute walking test,the exercise self-efficacy scale,and the heart failure quality of life questionnaire.Results In this study,three patients from the control group and one patient from the experimental group were lost to follow-up.The overall analysis showed that there were statistical significances in comparison between groups,comparison at time points and interaction between the two groups of cardiac function(P<0.05).Further pairings and intra-group comparison:LVEF at 4 weeks of intervention was higher than before intervention,LVEDD was lower than before intervention,LVEF at 12 weeks of intervention was higher than 4 weeks of intervention,LVESD and LVEDD were lower than 4 weeks of intervention(P<0.05).Intergroup comparison:after 12 weeks of intervention,LVEF of experimental group was higher than that of control group,LVESD and LVEDD were lower than that of control group(P<0.05).Overall analysis found that there were statistically significant differences in comparison,time point comparison and interaction between the two groups of 6-minute walking test groups(P<0.05).Further pairwise comparison,intra-group comparison:after 4 weeks of intervention,6-minute walking distance in both groups was higher than before intervention,and after 12 weeks of intervention was higher than after 4 weeks of intervention(P<0.05).Intergroup comparison:after 12 weeks of intervention,the experimental group was higher than the control group(P<0.05).The overall analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in the comparison,time point comparison and interaction between the two groups of exercise self-efficacy(P<0.05).Further pairwise comparison,intra-group comparison:after 4 weeks of intervention,the scores of exercise self-efficacy in both groups were higher than before intervention,and after 12 weeks of intervention were higher than after 4 weeks of intervention(P<0.05).Intergroup comparison:after 12 weeks of intervention,the experimental group was higher than the control group(P<0.05).The overall analysis showed that there were significant differences in the minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire of life between the two groups(among other areas),time point comparison and interaction(P<0.05).Further pairwise comparison,intra-group comparison:the control group was lower than before intervention in physical areas,other areas and total score after 4 weeks of intervention,the experimental group was lower than before intervention in all dimensions and total score after 4 weeks of intervention,and after 12 weeks of intervention was lower than after 4 weeks of intervention(P<0.05).Intergroup comparison:after 12 weeks of intervention,the experimental group was lower than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Continuous exercise management based on COM-B theory has a good application effect on the rehabilitation of patients with stable chronic heart failure.It can effectively improve cardiopulmonary function,exercise self-efficacy,and improve the quality of life.

Chronic heart failureWhole-process managementCOM-B theoryExercise interventionsHealing effect

屈博涵、郑美洁、郑光磊、李伟、刘文秀、赵亚琼、刘子萌、李贤

展开 >

华北理工大学护理与康复学院,河北唐山 063210

河北省人民医院消化内科,河北石家庄 050057

河北省廊坊市人民医院急诊重症医学科,河北廊坊 065000

河北省人民医院老年心血管内一科,河北石家庄 050057

河北省人民医院护理部,河北石家庄 050057

河北中医药大学护理学院,河北石家庄 050200

河北省人民医院医疗发展处,河北石家庄 050057

展开 >

慢性心力衰竭 全程化管理 COM-B理论 运动干预 康复效果

河北省政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目河北省医学科学研究课题计划

ZF202400620240083

2024

中国医药导报
中国医学科学院

中国医药导报

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.759
ISSN:1673-7210
年,卷(期):2024.21(27)
  • 13