医药导报2025,Vol.44Issue(1) :103-108.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2025.01.013

基于卫生技术评估的环泊酚用于麻醉镇静的附加价值评价

Evaluation of the Added Value of Ciprofol for Anesthesia and Sedation Based on Health Technology Assessment

杨春 马正敏 嵇富海 朱吉祥
医药导报2025,Vol.44Issue(1) :103-108.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2025.01.013

基于卫生技术评估的环泊酚用于麻醉镇静的附加价值评价

Evaluation of the Added Value of Ciprofol for Anesthesia and Sedation Based on Health Technology Assessment

杨春 1马正敏 1嵇富海 1朱吉祥2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 苏州大学附属第一医院麻醉科,苏州 215000
  • 2. 徐州医科大学盐城临床学院、盐城市第一人民医院麻醉科,盐城 224000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 通过对环泊酚的附加价值评价,为丙泊酚和环泊酚的临床选择、患者个体化麻醉镇静方案提供参考依据.方法 采用《基于卫生技术评估的药品附加价值评价指南》分别对丙泊酚与环泊酚的相对安全性、相对有效性、创新性/适宜性、经济性进行比较评分.结果 相较于丙泊酚的价值,环泊酚总得分为57分,价值体现为少量增加.二者镇静效果基本类似,但丙泊酚更具经济成本优势,而环泊酚在注射痛、低血压等不良反应方面优于丙泊酚.结论 麻醉镇静中应综合考虑患者健康状态、经济情况等合理选择使用丙泊酚和环泊酚.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the added value of ciprofol and to provide the reference for clinical selection of ciprofol and propofol in patient individualized anesthesia and sedation program.Methods The relative safety,relative effectiveness,innovation/suitability,and economy of propofol and ciprofol were compared and scored according to the Guidelines for Drug Added Value Evaluation based on Health Technology Evaluation.Results Compared with the value of propofol,the total value of ciprofol was 57 points,which was reflected as a small increase.The sedation effect of the two drugs was similar,but propofol had more economic cost advantages,and ciprofol was better than propofol in injection pain,hypotension,and other adverse reactions.Conclusion Propofol and ciprofol should be used reasonably in anesthesia and sedation,considering the health status and economic condition of patients.

关键词

环泊酚/丙泊酚/卫生技术评估/麻醉镇静/药品附加价值

Key words

Ciprofol/Propofol/Health technology assessment/Anesthesia sedation/Drug added value

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2025
医药导报
中国药理学会 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 中国医药商业协会

医药导报

北大核心
影响因子:1.042
ISSN:1004-0781
段落导航相关论文