The era of integrated media has made it possible to construct open academic criti-cism.Introducing open academic criticism into research evaluation is driven by both the in-ternal logic of research evaluation alienation and the lack of academic criticism,as well as the external logic of responding to the trust crisis of peer review.At the same time,it faces the challenges of selecting objective and effective criticism based on text from criticism chaos,classifying the value orientation of academic criticism,measuring the quality of academic crit-icism,and achieving digitization of academic criticism.To this end,an open academic criti-cism platform that integrates journals and networks should be constructed,and the chaos of open academic criticism should be managed in a diversified and simultaneous manner.The in-troduction of open academic criticism into scientific research evaluation is a supplement to peer review,and a combination of qualitative and quantitative evaluation should be adopted.Qualitative evaluation is made by peer reviewers,and quantitative evaluation is made by third-party professional evaluation institutions.The results of scientific research evaluation are mainly based on peer review,supplemented by open academic criticism.
open academic criticismscientific research evaluationpeer review
万方数据
维普
