首页|罪刑相适应是刑法分则解释的铁则

罪刑相适应是刑法分则解释的铁则

The Adaptation of Crime and Punishment is the Iron Rule of Interpretation of Criminal Law

扫码查看
"以刑制罪"论者主张为了所谓量刑公正而可以任意变换罪名,无视犯罪构成原理和罪刑法定原则,因而不可取.罪刑相适应作为刑法分则解释的铁则,应贯彻到刑法分则解释适用的每一个具体解释结论和处理结果当中.为实现罪刑相适应,根本无需严格区分法条竞合和想象竞合.选择罪名和概括罪名也能并罚.为开山采石以确保安全的方式运输、储存爆炸物的,不应作为犯罪处理.危险驾驶、妨害安全驾驶、危险作业造成伤亡结果的,只能成立交通肇事罪、危险物品肇事罪、责任事故犯罪,而不能成立以危险方法危害公共安全罪.我国刑法分则规定的行为并不都是实行行为,应准确区分预备行为与实行行为.
The theory of"crime by punishment"argues that the charges can be arbitrarily changed for the sake of the so-called justice of sentencing,ignoring the principle of the constitution of crime and the principle of legality of crime,so it is not advisable.The iron rule that crime and punishment fit into the interpretation of the specific provisions of criminal law should be carried out in every concrete interpretation conclusion and processing result.In order to realize the compatibility of crime and punishment,there is no need to strictly distinguish between the concurrence of law articles and the concurrence of imagination.Optional charges and general charges can also be punished.Transporting or storing explosives in a safe manner for the purpose of excavating mountains and quarrying stones shall not be treated as a crime.Dangerous driving,impairing safe driving,dangerous operation resulting in casualties,can only be established traffic crime,dangerous goods crime,responsibility accident crime,but can not be established by dangerous methods of endangering public security.The acts stipulated in the specific provisions of the criminal law of our country are not all acts of execution,we should accurately distinguish between preparatory acts and execution acts.

compatibility of crime and punishmentcriminalization by punishmentcompetition and cooperationaggravated offenseperforming act

陈洪兵

展开 >

东南大学法学院,江苏南京 211189

罪刑相适应 以刑制罪 竞合 加重犯 实行行为

国家社会科学基金一般项目

18BFX104

2024

政法论丛
山东政法学院

政法论丛

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.943
ISSN:1002-6274
年,卷(期):2024.(3)
  • 49