政法学刊2024,Vol.41Issue(1) :67-75.

抽象危险犯的正当性检讨——兼论醉驾入刑的若干问题

Review on the Legitimacy of Abstract Dangerous Crime--Also on Some Issues of Drunken Driving into Penalty

申伟 周洲
政法学刊2024,Vol.41Issue(1) :67-75.

抽象危险犯的正当性检讨——兼论醉驾入刑的若干问题

Review on the Legitimacy of Abstract Dangerous Crime--Also on Some Issues of Drunken Driving into Penalty

申伟 1周洲2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州 730000
  • 2. 中国政法大学中欧法学院,北京 100091
  • 折叠

摘要

"醉驾入刑"是风险社会语境下刑法预防转向之体现.欲厘清醉驾入刑相关疑议,应先阐清其不法内涵;学界普遍认为,《刑法》第一百三十三条之一的危险驾驶罪采抽象危险犯的立法形式,然抽象危险犯只是一种拟制危险,其处罚基础需进一步说明.从风险社会语境出发,以法益论和规范论两种进路检讨抽象危险犯的处罚基础,并得出结论:抽象危险犯与具体危险犯的区分并无太大意义,维持人们对规范的期待,使人们能够自由行使自身权利,才是对危险行为进行规制的理由.基于此规范—安全性理论,对醉驾条款提出相关立法建议.

Abstract

"Drunk driving into penalty"is the embodiment of the shift of criminal law prevention in the context of risk society.In order to clarify the doubts related to drunk driving into penalty,we should first clarify its illegal connotation.It is generally believed that the crime of dangerous driving in Article 133 of the criminal law adopts the legislative form of abstract dangerous crime,but the abstract dangerous crime is only a fictitious danger,and its penalty basis needs to be further explained.Starting from the context of risk society,this paper reviews the penalty basis of abstract dangerous crime from the two approaches of legal interest theory and norm theory,and comes to the conclusion that the distinction between abstract dangerous crime and specific dangerous crime is of little significance.Maintaining people's expectation of norms and enabling people to freely exercise their own rights are the reasons for regulating dangerous behavior.Based on this specification safety theory,this paper puts forward relevant legislative suggestions on drunk driving clauses.

关键词

醉驾入刑/抽象危险犯/法益论/规范论/安全性

Key words

Drunk Driving into Penalty/Abstract Dangerous Crime/Legal Interest Theory/Normative Theory/Safety

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
政法学刊
广东警官学院 广东省公安司法管理干部学院

政法学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.315
ISSN:1009-3745
参考文献量34
段落导航相关论文