首页|预测性警务赋能国家安全情报工作的逻辑进路与风险规制

预测性警务赋能国家安全情报工作的逻辑进路与风险规制

扫码查看
预测性警务已经成为数字时代公安机关获取情报的主要动力,正在世界各国的警务情报工作中广泛推广。这种警务实践通过改变情报的生产要素、消除情况认知的不确定性、参与战略方案的制定,进而在目的上实现对犯罪的前端预防,在手段上调整警力的部署与犯罪的侦查。然而,预测性警务在赋能国家安全情报工作的同时,还存在着"由算法偏见引发的歧视公民风险""利用预测性警务滥用权利的风险"等多重问题。对此,可在规制向度与规制路径两个维度进行消解。前者包括:在规制目的上,以保障集体法益为核心;在规制理念上,以保障潜在受害人为重点;在规制方向上,要充分保障公民的救济权利。后者包括:事前明确算法监管机构、事中建立算法合同制度、事后明确责任承担主体。
The Logical Approach and Risk Regulation of Predictive Policing to Empower National Security Intelligence Work
Predictive policing has become the main driving force for public security organs to obtain intelligence in the digital age,and is widely promoted in police intelligence work around the world.This kind of policing practice realizes the front-end prevention of crime,the deployment of police force and the investigation of crime by changing the production factors of intelligence,eliminating the uncertainty of situation cognition,and participating in the formulation of strategic plan.However,in the work of enabling national security intelligence,predictive policing still has many problems,such as"the risk of discrimination against citizens caused by algorithmic bias"and"the risk of abuse of power by using predictive policing".It can be dispelled in the two dimensions of regulation dimension and regulation path.The former includes:in the purpose of regulation,take the protection of collective legal interests as the core;in the concept of regulation,focus on the protection of potential victims;in the direction of regulation,fully protect the relief rights of citizens.The latter includes:define the regulatory body of the algorithm in advance,establish the contract system of the algorithm in the event,and define the subject of liability afterwards.

Predictive PolicingNational Security IntelligenceAlgorithmic DiscriminationAbuse of PowerRisk Regulation

秦长森

展开 >

东南大学法学院,江苏南京 211189

预测性警务 国家安全情报 算法歧视 集体法益 风险规制

2024

政法学刊
广东警官学院 广东省公安司法管理干部学院

政法学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.315
ISSN:1009-3745
年,卷(期):2024.41(3)