首页|论民事再审检察监督功能异化及其纾解

论民事再审检察监督功能异化及其纾解

扫码查看
民事再审检察监督事实上实行"不告不理"模式,也是事实上的"第四审",在程序设计中呈现出"法院纠错在先,检察监督在后"的再审监督模式。然而,实践过程中民事再审偏离了法律监督机关的宪法定位,呈现出功能异化的趋势。民事再审检察监督功能异化表现为功能目的异化、功能主体异化、功能结构异化、功能配置异化等多种形式。法律规范的模糊性、立法体例的救济权主导模式是目前再审检察监督功能异化的主要致成因素。为从根本上矫正功能异化的表现形式,需对民事再审检察监督制度进行改造,现代型监督理念的引入、区分申请再审事由与监督事由、区分再审检察建议事由与民事抗诉事由是民事再审检察监督功能异化的纾解良方。
On the Alienation and Relief of the Prosecutorial Supervision Function in Civil Retrial
In practice,the procuratorial supervision of civil retrial cases follows a"non-intervention unless petitioned"model,effectively functioning as a"fourth instance"of the judicial process.This model of retrial supervision is characterized by a procedural design that prioritizes court error correction before procuratorial supervision.However,in practice,civil retrial has deviated from the constitutional positioning of the legal supervisory organ,exhibiting a trend of functional alienation.The ambiguity of legal norms and the legislative style's focus on relief rights are the main factors contributing to the alienation of procuratorial supervision functions in civil retrial.To fundamentally correct the manifestations of functional alienation,it is necessary to reform the procuratorial supervision system for civil retrial.Introducing modern supervision concepts,distinguishing between grounds for applying for retrial and grounds for supervision,and distinguishing between the grounds for procuratorial suggestions for retrial and grounds for civil protests are effective solutions to alleviate the alienation of procuratorial supervision functions in civil retrial.

Procuratorial Supervision of Civil RetrialFunctional AlienationSupervision Concept

代天钰

展开 >

西南财经大学法学院,四川成都 611130

民事再审检察监督 功能异化 监督理念

2024

政法学刊
广东警官学院 广东省公安司法管理干部学院

政法学刊

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.315
ISSN:1009-3745
年,卷(期):2024.41(3)