中国边疆史地研究2024,Vol.34Issue(2) :161-174.

文武之争抑或党争——宋初西北弭兵论再检讨

Civil-Military Struggle or Factional Struggle:Research on the Anti-war Argument Conserning Tangut in the Early Song Dynasty

叶凯
中国边疆史地研究2024,Vol.34Issue(2) :161-174.

文武之争抑或党争——宋初西北弭兵论再检讨

Civil-Military Struggle or Factional Struggle:Research on the Anti-war Argument Conserning Tangut in the Early Song Dynasty

叶凯1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 西华师范大学历史文化学院
  • 折叠

摘要

宋代弭兵论一向被认为从属于宋朝的"崇文抑武"政策,即文官政治的产物.然而宋初的西北弭兵论,论战的两方仍然是士大夫群体.通过探讨当时两派意见的分歧,特别是西北弭兵论与援救灵州的措施,以及太平兴国五年进士群体的关系,可以发现西北弭兵论的背后是朝廷朋党之间的博弈,以李沆为首的政治派系打压张齐贤一派士人,严重耽误了援救灵州工作的展开.另外这也说明研究宋代士人政治不能忽视党争的一面.

Abstract

The Anti-war Argument in the Song Dynasty is always considered as the product of civil oriention of Song government,exalting the civil officials at the expense of the military.However,the main persernel of the two sides involving in the Anti-war Argument Conserning Tangut were civil officials.The paper discusses the differences between both sides,especially on the link between the argument and the actions on reinforcing Lingzhou(灵州),as well as the Jingshi(进士)groups in 980.In a word,factional struggle was the nature of the argument that the party groups led by Li Hang(李沆)suppressed on that led by Zhang Qixian(张齐贤),which terribly delayed rescuing Lingzhou.This shows factional struggle can not be neglected for studying the politics of Song Dynasty.

关键词

宋朝/西北弭兵论/党争/灵州

Key words

the Song Dynasty/Anti-war Argument Conserning Tangut/Factional Struggle/Lingzhou

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

四川省社会科学规划一般项目(SC22B055)

出版年

2024
中国边疆史地研究
中国社会科学院中国边疆史地研究中心

中国边疆史地研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.459
ISSN:1002-6800
参考文献量2
段落导航相关论文