"道""共在"与诗歌的"发生"——中西文化互释中的奥登诗歌
白洋本1
作者信息
摘要
奥登曾阅读阿瑟·韦利翻译的《道德经》并尤为重视"道".探究奥登对"道"的理解,既需回溯他的西方思想背景以解释他对东方概念的独特领悟,又可借他对东方哲思的读解激发相关的西方思想,从而在文化的互释中为解释他的诗学转变提供线索.奥登将"道"视为协助人在"智性"与"感官"、"含混不清"与"微不足道"两极之间实现平衡的"关系性"绳索;他对"道"的理解源自尼布尔对"骄傲"的批判,形成他对"谦卑"德性的追求,引起他对蒂利希的"关系"、布伯的"我与你"、威廉斯的"共在"等思想的接受;这些激发他在宣告"诗歌不能使任何事情发生"之后寻找到诗歌"发生"并"幸存"的方式."共在"中的"关系"凸显"道"之核心,"道"中"有无相生"的"关系"也呼应"共在"迥异于"逻各斯中心"的特质,这是奥登构建对话诗学的思想基础并彰显他颠覆形而上学禁忌的诗学追求.
Abstract
Auden read Arthur Waley's translation of the Quietist Tao Té Ching and became absorbed in"Tao"around 1940s.Based on Auden's comprehension of"Tao",this paper provides a path to elucidate his poetic switch by retracing his Western intellectual background.Auden saw Tao as a"correlative"tightrope to facilitate one to strike a balance between polarities such as intellect and sense as well as vagueness and triviality.His pursuit of"Tao"stemmed from Niebuhr's critique of pride,resulted in his yearning for humility and later acknowledgement of philosophical ideas such as Tillich's"relation",Buber's"I and Thou",and Williams'"The Co-inherence".This spurred him to explore how poetry could"happen"and"survive"after he claimed that"poetry makes nothing happen".Auden understood"Tao"in terms of correlative"Co-Inherence",and the relation of"growing out of one another"in"Tao"also echoed"Co-Inherence"which differed from"Logocentrism".This was the philosophical background of Auden's dialogue-based poetics and revealed his poetic quest for subverting metaphysical prohibition.
关键词
奥登/道/共在/对话Key words
W.H.Auden/Tao/Co-inherence/dialogue引用本文复制引用
基金项目
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地中国人民大学欧洲问题研究中心重大项目(22JJD720020)
山东大学教学研究与教学改革项目(Y2023010)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据