首页|CAMP试验在无乳链球菌鉴定中的价值及其阴性结果产生机制的探讨

CAMP试验在无乳链球菌鉴定中的价值及其阴性结果产生机制的探讨

扫码查看
目的:探讨Christie-Atkinson-Munch-Peterson(CAMP)试验在无乳链球菌(Streptococcus agalactiae)鉴定中的价值及敏感性,并对CAMP试验阴性无乳链球菌产生的机制进行初步探讨。方法:收集2018年1月至2023年1月广东省中医院大学城医院无乳链球菌临床分离株,菌株经基质辅助激光解吸电离-飞行时间质谱(ma-trix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry,MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定为无乳链球菌后均进行CAMP试验;筛选CAMP试验阴性菌株,通过生化试验、16S rDNA基因测序及分子生物学手段探讨cfb基因缺失在其阴性结果中的机制;通过统计分析无乳链球菌的临床标本来源和药敏试验结果,探讨cfb基因缺失是否与标本来源相关及是否影响其耐药。结果:112株无乳链球菌中出现2株CAMP试验阴性菌株,经16S rDNA序列分析确认为无乳链球菌,CAMP试验阳性的符合率为98。2%(110/112)。2株CAMP试验阴性菌株cfb基因检测均为阴性。112株无乳链球菌的临床标本来源分别是中段尿(39株),精液(39株),宫颈拭子(9株),分泌物(5株),尿道拭子(5株),静脉血(4株),脓液(4株),痰(2株),伤口拭子(2株),未知(2株)。本实验室分离的无乳链球菌对青霉素、利奈唑胺、氨苄西林、万古霉素的敏感性均为100%,对左旋氧氟沙星的耐药率为24。44%。2株CAMP试验阴性无乳链球菌均来源于中段尿标本,对青霉素、利奈唑胺、氨苄西林、万古霉素、左旋氧氟沙星均敏感。结论:CAMP试验对于无乳链球菌鉴定存在阴性可能性,CAMP试验阴性的可能机制是cfb基因缺失,这种缺失对抗生素治疗敏感性影响不大。临床检验工作中检出的无乳链球菌主要来自中段尿及精液标本,提示其可能引起尿路感染,而与男性疾病的相关性尚不确定。
Value of CAMP trial in identification of Streptococcus agalactiae and ex-ploration of mechanism of negative results
AIM:This study aims to investigate the utility of the Christie-Atkinson-Munch-Peterson(CAMP)test in identifying Streptococcus agalactiae and to assess the sensitivity of positive CAMP test results for this identification.We also identified and analyzed Streptococcus agalactiae isolates that exhibited negative CAMP test results and conducted a preliminary study on the possible mechanisms behind these occurrences.METHODS:Streptococcus agalactiae isolates were collected from the University Town Branch of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine be-tween January 2018 and January 2023.Isolates identified as Streptococcus agalactiae using an automated rapid microbial mass spectrometry detection system underwent the CAMP test.CAMP-negative strains were screened,and the presence of the cfb gene was assessed.We also conducted a statistical analysis of the clinical sources of the samples and the drug sensi-tivity test results for Streptococcus agalactiae.RESULTS:Among 112 Streptococcus agalactiae strains,two CAMP-nega-tive strains were identified,which were confirmed as Streptococcus agalactiae through 16S rDNA sequencing and showed negative detection of the cfb gene.The clinical sample sources for the 112 strains were as follows:midstream urine(34.82%),semen(34.82%),cervical swab(8.04%),secretion(4.46%),urethral swab(4.46%),venous blood(3.57%),pus(3.57%),sputum(1.79%),wound swab(1.79%),and unknown sources(1.79%).All Streptococcus agalactiae strains in our laboratory were found to be 100%sensitive to penicillin,linezolid,ampicillin,and vancomycin,while the resistance rate to levofloxacin was 24.44%.CONCLUSION:The positive results of the CAMP test demonstrate its potential for identifying Streptococcus agalactiae.The negative CAMP test results observed in the two strains could be at-tributed to the deletion of the cfb gene.The majority of Streptococcus agalactiae detected in clinical laboratory work were sourced from midstream urine and semen,indicating a potential association with urinary tract infections.However,the correlation with male reproductive diseases remains uncertain.

CAMP testStreptococcus agalactiae16S rDNA gene sequencingcfb gene

李沫、屈平华、张燕娇、张轩

展开 >

广州中医药大学第二附属医院检验医学部,广东 广州 510006

CAMP试验 无乳链球菌 16S rDNA基因测序 cfb基因

2024

中国病理生理杂志
中国病理生理学会

中国病理生理杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.065
ISSN:1000-4718
年,卷(期):2024.40(12)