首页|不同ACEI药物治疗高血压的Meta分析

不同ACEI药物治疗高血压的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价咪达普利及其他血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(ACEI)类药物的降压疗效及致咳嗽不良反应。方法 利用计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane、CNKI、WanFang Data等数据库收集国内外公开发表的使用盐酸咪达普利片等ACEI类药物治疗高血压的随机对照试验(RCTs)文献,检索截止日期为 2022 年 12 月,由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用固定或随机效应模型汇总研究结果,并使用RevMan5。3 完成Meta分析,绘制森林图。采用降压有效率以及致干咳不良反应等指标系统评估盐酸咪达普利片治疗高血压的有效性及安全性。结果 本研究共纳入 12 篇文献,累计 2 173 例研究对象,Meta分析结果表明:①有效率:盐酸咪达普利片治疗高血压的有效率与卡托普利、培哚普利、西拉普利、依那普利比较,差异无统计学意义[80。5%vs。73。4%,RR=1。06,95%CI(0。97,1。15),P=0。22]。②药物不良反应:盐酸咪达普利片治疗高血压的不良反应发生率显著低于依那普利、卡托普利,差异有统计学意义[10。7%vs。17。8%,RR=0。51,95%CI(0。32,0。83),P=0。006;15。4%vs。33。3%,RR=0。47,95%CI(0。27,0。84),P=0。05]。③干咳发生率:盐酸咪达普利片治疗原发性高血压或肾实质性高血压的干咳不良反应发生率显著低于贝那普利、卡托普利、西拉普利以及依那普利,差异有统计学意义[5。2%vs。13。9%,RR=0。37,95%CI(0。25,0。54),P<0。000 01;8。6%vs。21。6%,RR=0。40,95%CI(0。25,0。65),P=0。000 2;13。8%vs。25。5%,RR=0。54,95%CI(0。31,0。95),P=0。03;6。9%vs。15。5%,RR=0。42,95%CI(0。27,0。65),P=0。001]。而与培哚普利相比,咪达普利干咳发生率略低,但差异无统计学意义[11。3%vs。12。6%,RR=0。90,95%CI(0。43,1。88),P=0。77]。结论 盐酸咪达普利片与卡托普利、培哚普利、西拉普利、依那普利的降压疗效相当,但干咳发生率显著低于贝那普利、卡托普利、西拉普利等ACEI类药物,具有更好的临床应用优势。
Meta-analysis of different angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension
Objective To systematically evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and cough induced adverse reactions of imidapril and other angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEI).Methods PubMed,Cochrane,CNKI,WanFang Data and other databases were used to search the published literatures of randomized controlled trials(RCTs)involving the use of imidapril hydrochloride tablets and other ACEI drugs in the treatment of hypertension at home and abroad.The search deadline was December 2022.Two investigators independently screened the literature,extracted the data,and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.Fixed or random effects models were used to summarize the study results,and RevMan5.3 was used to complete the Meta-analysis and draw the forest map.The efficacy and safety of imidapril hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of hypertension were systematically evaluated by the indexes of antihypertensive efficiency and adverse reactions to dry cough.Results A total of 12 articles were included in this study,with a total of 2 173 subjects.The results of meta-analysis showed that:① Effective rate:There was no significant difference in the effective rate of midapril hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of hypertension compared with captopril,perindopril,cilapril and enalapril groups[80.5%vs.73.4%,RR=1.06,95%CI(0.97,1.15),P=0.22].② Adverse drug reactions:The incidence of adverse reactions of imidapril hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of hypertension was significantly lower than that of enalapril and captopril,with statistical significance[10.7%vs.17.8%,RR=0.51,95%CI(0.32,0.83),P=0.006;15.4%vs.33.3%,RR=0.47,95%CI(0.27,0.84),P=0.05].③Incidence of dry cough:The incidence of dry cough adverse reactions of imidapril hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of essential hypertension or renal parenchymal hypertension was significantly lower than that of benazepril,captopril,cillapril and enalapril,with statistical significance[5.2%vs.13.9%,RR=0.37,95%CI(0.25,0.54),P<0.000 01;8.6%vs.21.6%,RR=0.40,95%CI(0.25,0.65),P=0.000 2;13.8%vs.25.5%,RR=0.54,95%CI(0.31,0.95),P=0.03;6.9%vs.15.5%,RR=0.42,95%CI(0.27,0.65),P=0.001].Compared with perindopril,imidapril had a slightly lower incidence of dry cough,but the difference was not statistically significant[11.3%vs.12.6%,RR=0.90,95%CI(0.43,1.88),P=0.77].Conclusion The antihypertensive effect of imidapril hydrochloride tablets is similar to that of captopril,perindopril,cillapril and enalapril,but the incidence of dry cough is significantly lower than that of benazepril,captopril,cillapril and other ACEI drugs,which has better clinical application advantages.

ACEIImidapril hydrochlorideHypertensionDry cough

刘鹏

展开 >

邵阳市中心医院心血管内科,湖南邵阳 422000

ACEI 盐酸咪达普利 高血压 干咳

2024

中国处方药
南方医药经济研究所

中国处方药

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1671-945X
年,卷(期):2024.22(5)
  • 15