A Comparative Analysis of Urban Forest Practices Based on Nature-Based Solutions Between China and the EU:A Case Study of Beijing in China and Brussels in Belgium
We explored the application of NBS and UF-NBS through a comparative analysis of Beijing in China and Brussels in Belgium,aiming to lay a foundation for the localized application of NBS and UF-NBS in a broader range.The main findings indicate that due to the difference in natural conditions,Beijing prioritizes the large-scale afforestation projects in urban forest development,with the focus on ecosystem restoration,while Brussels puts the focus on biodiversity conservation in its UF-NBS project.In terms of governance,Beijing adopts the government leading governance characterized with interconnected joint actions of various authorities,while Brussels employs a complex governance system that involves urban planners and citizens,with relatively high public participation.In this sense,China's experience in large-scale urban forest establishment could provide an effective reference for Brussels,but need to learn from Brussels'experience in public participation.China should further improve citizens'recognition and acceptance of UF-NBS,and encouraging citizens to participate in and supervise the entire process of UF-NBS planning,design,construction,management,protection and renewal.This would help make urban forest development a public social endeavor.
万方数据
