首页|中欧城市地区矿山生态修复对比分析——以中国淮北市和德国盖尔森基兴市为例

中欧城市地区矿山生态修复对比分析——以中国淮北市和德国盖尔森基兴市为例

扫码查看
中国坚持山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和系统治理,矿山生态修复是重要的治理内容.欧美国家矿山生态修复开始较早,在理论、技术和实践方面都可以提供很好的参考,但是目前我国研究大多是单方面介绍,缺乏对比分析.文章选取矿山生态修复类型相似的中国淮北市和德国盖尔森基兴市(位于鲁尔区)为研究对象,在梳理两个城市采煤塌陷地发展概况,以及各自国家、省、城市等不同尺度在生态修复方面采取的措施和进展基础上,从多方面进行实践与经验对比分析.结果表明:中国和德国建立法律法规、政策机制等方面的生态修复治理体系在时间上较为同步,但是中国实践进度落后;淮北市和鲁尔区均注重通过矿山生态修复恢复完整的生态系统,为居民提供生态休闲空间;淮北市资金投入来源少,管理效率和工程效益有待提升;鲁尔区的近自然生态修复和管护技术值得借鉴;两个城市的生态修复质量均有待提升,需要加强理论和技术研究、工程监督和长期监测.
A Comparative Study of Mine Ecological Restoration in Urban Areas Between China and the EU:Case Studies of Huaibei City in China and Gelsenkirchen in Germany
China stresses the importance of the integrated protection and governance of ecosystems,including mountains,waters,forests,farmlands,lakes,grasslands,and deserts,while the ecological restoration of mining sites is a significant component.European and American countries began the ecological restoration of mining sites earlier,offering valuable references in theory,technology,and practices.However,the current studies in the field are centered on the introduction of these countries'experience,lacking in comparative analyses.This paper selects two cities which adopt the similar model of ecological restoration for mine sites:Huaibei in China and Gelsenkirchen in Germany(located in the Ruhr area),reviews the conditions of coal mining subsidence areas in the two cities as well as the measures for and the progress at the national,provincial,and local levels in ecological restoration,and conducts a comparative analysis of their practices and experiences from multiple perspectives.The results indicate that while China and Germany have kept abreast with each other in the formulation of laws,regulations,and policy mechanism of ecological restoration governance.China lags behind Germany in its restoration practices.Both Huaibei and the Ruhr area emphasize the complete restoration of ecosystems to provide leisure spaces for residents through mine sites'ecological restoration.However,Huaibei has limited sources of funding,and there is a space for the management efficiency and project benefits to be improved.The near-natural techniques of ecological restoration and maintenance in the Ruhr area are worth learning from.The quality of ecological restoration in both cities still needs to be further improved,necessitating the strengthening of theoretical and technical research,robust project supervision,and long-term monitoring.

comparison between Chinese and German citiesabandoned mining sitebrownfieldwastelandecological restoration

孙振凯、王成、金佳莉

展开 >

中国林业科学研究院林业研究所 北京 100091

国家林业和草原局城市森林研究中心 北京 100091

广东珠江口城市群森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站 广东东莞 523106

中德城市对比 矿山废弃地 棕地 受损弃置地 生态修复

国家重点研发计划项目中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项

2021YFE0193200CAFYBB2020ZB008

2024

中国城市林业
中国林业科学研究院

中国城市林业

影响因子:0.467
ISSN:1672-4925
年,卷(期):2024.22(4)
  • 15