首页|CT和MRI对急性缺血性脑卒中的诊断价值对比分析

CT和MRI对急性缺血性脑卒中的诊断价值对比分析

扫码查看
目的 对比分析电子计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)技术对急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者的诊断价值.方法 选取2020年1月至2023年10月在本院、新乡医学院第一附属医院共确诊的180例AIS患者为研究对象.所有患者分别行CT和MRI检查,记录两种方法检查下的动脉狭窄程度,CT检测参数[梗死区和镜像区脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)、血流平均通过时间(MTT)、达峰时间(TTP)]和MRI检测参数[梗死区和镜像区CBF、表观扩散系数(ADC)];采用ROC曲线分别分析相关参数对AIS患者的诊断价值.结果 AIS患者通过MRI检查的中度动脉狭窄检出率较CT检查多,轻度狭窄检出率较CT检查少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).CT检查下,AIS患者梗死区MTT和TTP值均高于镜像区,CBV和CBF值明显低于镜像区(P<0.05);MRI检查下,AIS患者梗死区CBF和ADC值均低于镜像区,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析结果表明,CT检查下的MTT(AUC=0.760)、TTP(AUC=0.788)和CBF(AUC=0.759)水平对AIS具有良好的诊断价值(P<0.05);MRI检查下的ADC(AUC=0.786)和CBF(AUC=0.834)水平对AIS具有良好的诊断价值(P<0.05),且MRI检查下CBF值的诊断价值最高.结论 CT和MRI检查均对急性缺血性脑卒中患者病灶具有良好的诊断价值,且MRI检查下的梗死灶CBF值较CT检查更准确.
A Comparative Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of CT and MRI in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Objective To compare and analyze the diagnostic value of computerized tomography(CT)and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS).Methods A total of 180 patients with AIS confirmed in the hospital were enrolled as the research objects between January 2020 and October 2023.All underwent CT and MRI examinations.The artery stenosis degree,CT parameters[cerebral blood flow(CBF),cerebral blood volume(CBV),mean transit time(MTT)and time to peak(TTP)in infarct and mirror areas]and MRI parameters[CBF and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)in infarct and mirror areas]by the two methods were recorded.The diagnostic value of relevant parameters in AIS patients was analyzed by ROC curves.Results The detection rate of moderate artery stenosis by MRI was higher than that by CT,while detection rate of mild stenosis was lower than that by CT(P<0.05).Under CT examination,MTT and TTP in infarct area were longer than those in mirror area,while CBV and CBF were significantly lower than those in mirror area(P<0.05).Under MRI examination,CBF and ADC in infarction area were lower than those in mirror area(P<0.05).The results of ROC curves analysis showed that MTT(AUC=0.760),TTP(AUC=0.788)and CBF(AUC=0.759)by CT were of good diagnostic value for AIS patients(P<0.05),while ADC(AUC=0.786)and CBF(AUC=0.834)by MRI were also of good diagnostic value for AIS patients(P<0.05).The diagnostic value of CBF by MRI was the highest.Conclusion Both CT and MRI have good diagnostic value in patients with AIS.CBF of infarction lesion by MRI is more accurate than that by CT.

Acute Ischemic StrokeComputerized TomographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging

何峰艺、张成芳、郭亚楠、周洁萍

展开 >

湖南中医药大学第一附属医院放射影像科(湖南长沙 410007)

新乡医学院第一附属医院核磁共振室(河南新乡 453100)

上林县人民医院放射科(广西南宁 530500)

急性缺血性脑卒中 电子计算机断层扫描 磁共振成像

湖南省自然科学基金项目

2022JJ70114

2024

中国CT和MRI杂志
北京大学深圳临床医学院 北京大学第一医院

中国CT和MRI杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.578
ISSN:1672-5131
年,卷(期):2024.22(10)