中国CT和MRI杂志2024,Vol.22Issue(12) :29-31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2024.12.010

多期延迟PCASL对进展性脑梗死预后评估

Evaluation for Prognosis of Progressive Cerebral Infarction Using Multi-phase Delay PCASL

戴中强 郑少升 陈群中 顾浩玉 刘征华 郭学军 李思聪 廖海波 万星华
中国CT和MRI杂志2024,Vol.22Issue(12) :29-31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2024.12.010

多期延迟PCASL对进展性脑梗死预后评估

Evaluation for Prognosis of Progressive Cerebral Infarction Using Multi-phase Delay PCASL

戴中强 1郑少升 1陈群中 2顾浩玉 2刘征华 3郭学军 4李思聪 2廖海波 2万星华5
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 普宁市中医医院医学影像科(广东揭阳 522000)
  • 2. 深圳市宝安区中心医院放射科(广东 深圳 518100)
  • 3. 南昌大学第三附属医院(江西南昌 330000)
  • 4. 北京大学深圳医院放射科(广东 深圳 518036)
  • 5. 南昌县人民医院放射科(江西南昌 330000)
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 运用多期ASL技术联合DWI技术评估进展性脑梗死(PIS)临床预后.方法 前瞻性纳入急性缺血性脑卒中患者共55例行DWI及3D-PCASL检查,计算梗死区DWI高信号面积及血流灌注CBF值,根据临床治疗效果,55例患者分成PIS组和非PIS组,比较不同组别各参数值是否存在差异,绘制ROC曲线,计算各参数值对进展性脑梗死诊断能效及判断预后价值.结果 55例急性脑梗死患者中,20例为PIS,35例为非PIS.PIS组与非PIS组相比,CBF值均有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中1.5s-PLD CBF值:PIS组为(14.82±5.15)mL/100mg/min,非PIS组为(28.42±11.64)mL/100mg/min;2.0s-PLD CBF值:PIS组为(23.96±9.51)mL/100mg/min,非PIS组为(33.79±13.52)mL/100mg/min;2.5s-PLD CBF值:PIS组为(30.51±11.22)mL/100mg/min,非PIS组为(38.67±12.86)mL/100mg/min.DWI梗死面积:PIS组为(886.24±12.32)mm2,非PIS组为(900.76±1087.21)mm2,两组相比无统计学意义(P>0.05).ROC曲线分析表明,1.5s-PLD诊断PIS能效最好,当CBF取值19.29时,其曲线下面积最大,AUC为0.89,其诊断敏感性为80%,特异性为85%.结论 多期PLD可以准确预测PIS,当PLD为1.5s时,其衍生CBF值为 19.29 mL/100mg/min时敏感性和特异性均高于其它灌注参数值,可以作为判断PIS参数指标.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the prognosis of progressive cerebral infarction(PIS)through using multi-phasic post labeling delay(PLD)pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling technique(PCASL)combined with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI).Methods A total of 55 patients with acute cerebral infarction diagnosed by clinical and DWI were prospectively included in DWI and multi-phase delayed PCASL examination.The high signal area of DWI and the CBF value of blood perfusion in the infarcted area were calculated.The patients were divided into progressive cerebral infarction group and non-progressive cerebral infarction group.The differences of parameters in different groups were compared,Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn,and the diagnostic efficiency and prognostic value of each parameter were evaluated.Results Of the 55 patients with acute cerebral infarction,20 were PIS,35 were non-PIS.The values of CBF were statistically significant in PIS group and non-PIS group(P<0.05).The CBF value of 1.5s-PLD was(14.82±5.15)ml/100mg/min in PIS group and(28.42±11.64)mL/100mg/min in non-PIS group;The CBF value of 2.0s-PLD was(23.96±9.51)mL/100mg/min in PIS group and(33.79±13.52)mL/100mg/min in non-PIS group.The CBF value of 2.5s-PLD was(30.51±11.22)mL/100mg/min in PIS group and(38.67±12.86)mL/100mg/min in non-PIS group.The infarct size of DWI was(886.24±12.32)mm2 in PIS group and(900.76±1087.21)mm2 in non-PIS group respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).ROC curve analysis indicated that the 1.5s-PLD CBF value was most effective in the diagnosis of PIS.The largest area under curve(AUC)was 0.89 at a CBF value of 19.29 mL/100mg/min,and the sensitivity and the specificity were 80%and 85%,respectively.Conclusion The multiphasic PLD method demonstrates high accuracy in predicting progressive cerebral infarction(PIS).When the PLD is set to 1.5 seconds,the derived cerebral blood flow(CBF)value of 19.29 mL/100mg/min exhibits superior sensitivity and specificity compared to other perfusion parameters.Therefore,it can serve as a reliable indicator for identifying PIS.

关键词

急性脑梗死/进展性脑梗死/准连续动脉自旋标记/标记后延迟时间/弥散加权成像

Key words

Acute Cerebral Infarction/Progressive Cerebral Infarction/Pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling/Post-labeling Delay/Diffusion Weighted Imaging

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国CT和MRI杂志
北京大学深圳临床医学院 北京大学第一医院

中国CT和MRI杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.578
ISSN:1672-5131
段落导航相关论文