首页|政策视角下综合素质评价的定位与实施路径研究

政策视角下综合素质评价的定位与实施路径研究

扫码查看
尽管经过多年的探索,综合素质评价在各地的实践中仍面临诸多现实困境.因此,厘清政策视角下综合素质评价的定位和实施路径,以为其有效落地提供方向指引尤为关键.该研究基于大语言模型和K-means聚类等量化分析方法,对1985年至今的80份国家上位政策文件展开分析,深入挖掘政策文件中关于综合素质评价内涵定位、目标定位、评价方法、结果应用的核心话语主题,并系统梳理这些主题在不同发展阶段的演进脉络及相互关系.基于研究结果提出以下发展建议:完善理论体系建设,体现综合素质评价全面性与发展性的内涵定位;构建长周期诊断性评价体系,平衡选拔与育人双重目标定位;加强技术赋能,建立兼具方法科学性与地方适应性的评价体系;探索数据转换机制,提升综合素质评价在教育宏观治理中的调控作用;构建内涵定位、目标定位、评价方法与结果应用四位一体的闭环机制,推动综合素质评价向与社会需求相适应的动态优化体系发展.
Positioning and Implementation Pathways of Comprehensive Quality Evaluation from a Policy Perspective
Despite years of exploration,the practical implementation of comprehensive quality evaluation continues to face numerous challenges.Therefore,clarifying the policy perspective on the positioning and implementation pathways of comprehensive quality evaluation is critical to providing clear guidance for its effective execution.The study utilizes qualitative analytical methods,including large language models and K-means clustering,to analyze 80 national-level policy documents from 1985 to the present.Then,the study explores the key discourse themes in these documents concerning the connotation positioning,goal positioning,evaluation methods and result application in comprehensive quality evaluation,and traces the evolution and relationships of these themes across different developmental stages.Finally,the study proposes the following recommendations:enhancing the theoretical framework to reflect the dual connotation positioning of comprehensiveness and developmental orientation;constructing a long-term diagnostic evaluation system to balance the dual goals of selection and student development;strengthening technology-enabled solutions to establish an evaluation system that combines methodological rigor with local adaptability;exploring data conversion mechanisms to enhance the role of comprehensive quality evaluation in educational governance;and building a closed-loop mechanism to drive comprehensive quality evaluation toward a dynamically optimized system aligned with societal needs.

comprehensive quality evaluationevaluation reformpolicy analysislarge language modelsK-means

郑勤华、刘司卓、宋义深

展开 >

北京师范大学 远程教育研究中心,北京 100875

综合素质评价 评价改革 政策文本分析 大语言模型 K-means

2024

中国电化教育
中央电化教育馆

中国电化教育

CSSCI北大核心
影响因子:4.435
ISSN:1006-9860
年,卷(期):2024.(12)