首页|肺楔形切除术治疗小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者临床疗效分析

肺楔形切除术治疗小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者临床疗效分析

扫码查看
背景与目的 随着对肿瘤最大径≤2 cm的非小细胞肺癌的进一步认识和研究,肺段切除术能够达到与肺叶切除术相同的远期预后.但是,针对肺楔形切除术对浸润深度在0.5-1.0 cm的小体积浸润性肺腺癌的预后影响的相关研究较少.因此,本研究主要探讨小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者行楔形切除术的临床疗效与预后.方法 回顾性分析2016年2月至2017年12月于安徽医科大学附属省立医院胸外科行手术治疗且术后病理结果证实为小体积浸润性肺腺癌的208例患者病历资料.根据手术方式的不同分为肺叶组(n=115)、肺段组(n=48)和楔形组(n=45)三组,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线估计法和Cox比例风险回归模型探讨不同手术方式对小体积浸润性肺腺癌术后患者预后的影响.结果 楔形组与肺段组、肺叶组相比具有更好的围手术期疗效,在术中出血量(P=0.036)、术后引流量(P<0.001)、手术时间(P=0.018)、术后带管时间(P=0.001)、术后并发症发生率(P=0.006)方面差异均有统计学意义.三组患者在生存率(肺叶组vs肺段组,P=0.303;肺叶组vs楔形组,P=0.742;肺段组vs楔形组,P=0.278)和无复发生存率(肺叶组vs肺段组,P=0.495;肺叶组vs楔形组,P=0.362;肺段组vs楔形组,P=0.775)方面无明显差异;单因素及多因素生存分析显示:实性成分占比(consolidation tumor ratio,CTR)是小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者的总生存期和无复发生存期的影响因素(P<0.05).结论 对于小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者行楔形切除术可以取得与肺段切除术和肺叶切除术相似的远期预后.当CTR≤0.5时,此类患者优先行楔形切除术.
Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Wedge Resection of Pulmonary in Patients with Small Volume Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma
Background and objective With further understanding and research into non-small cell lung cancer with tumours ≤2 cm in maximum diameter,segmental lung resection is able to achieve the same long-term prognosis as lobec-tomy.However,there are few studies on the prognostic effect of wedge resection on small volume invasive lung adenocarci-noma with an invasion depth of 0.5 to 1.0 cm.Therefore,this study focuses on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of wedge re-section in patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Methods A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 208 patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University from February 2016 to December 2017 was made,and the postoperative pathological results confirmed small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.According to their surgical methods,they were divided into lobectomy group(n=115),segmentectomy group(n=48)and wedge resection group(n=45).Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimation and Cox proportional risk regression model were used to explore the influence of different surgical methods on the prognosis of patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.Results The wedge resection group had better perioperative outcomes compared with the segmentectomy group and lobectomy group,with statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleed-ing(P=0.036),postoperative drainage(P<0.001),operative time(P=0.018),postoperative time with tubes(P=0.001),and postoperative complication rate(P=0.006).There were no significant differences when comparing the three groups in terms of survival rate(lobectomy group vs segmentectomy group,P=0.303;lobectomy group vs wedge resection group,P=0.742;and segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group,P=0.278)and recurrence-free survival rate(lobectomy group vs segmentec-tomy group,P=0.495;lobectomy group vs wedge resection group,P=0.362;segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group,P=0.775).Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that consolidation tumor ratio(CTR)was the prognostic factor of overall survival and revurrence-free survival for patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma(P<0.05).Conclusion Wedge resection in patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma can achieve long-term outcomes similar to segmentectomy and lobectomy.When the CTR≤0.5,wedge resection is preferred in such patients.

Lung neoplasmsLobectomySegmentectomyWedge resectionEfficacyPrognosis

崔世军、王高祥、黄志宁、吴明胜、吴汉然、周杭城、徐美青、解明然

展开 >

230001 合肥,安徽医科大学附属省立医院胸外科

中国科学技术大学附属第一医院胸外科

中国科学技术大学附属第一医院病理科

肺肿瘤 肺叶切除术 肺段切除术 楔形切除术 疗效 预后

国家自然科学基金项目安徽省高等学校教学研究项目

819736432020xjyxm089

2024

中国肺癌杂志
中国抗癌协会 中国防痨协会 天津医科大学总医院

中国肺癌杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.397
ISSN:1009-3419
年,卷(期):2024.27(5)
  • 6