首页|互联网司法的正义体系

互联网司法的正义体系

扫码查看
互联网司法的正义性是司法现代化的一个重要方面.互联网法院、在线诉讼与人工智能司法构成当代互联网司法的基本面貌,互联网司法的多样化样态带来了差异性正义诉求,以及进行合理融贯性论证的要求.首先,互联网司法改变的是司法公共服务资源供给方式,其分配既要在工具角色上贯彻需求原则与比例原则,提升互联网司法的效率与便利度,又要在功能角色上贯彻平等原则与贡献原则,实现新型司法资源的分配正义,并借助互联网法院的行政司法职能实现互联网治理.其次,以互联网技术为主导的在线诉讼改变了司法场所,相应地改变了当事人程序参与和程序控制的方式,在线诉讼一方面需要遵循传统程序正义的规范标准,另一方面尚需借助主观程序正义所蕴含的社会评价机制,以增进社会对诉讼程序与结果的信任.最后,人工智能司法中算法和区块链的司法运用使特定事项的自动化判断成为可能,在复制人类法官"外观"辅助或替代司法判断的同时,应设置纠偏系统和事后审查机制,以确保判断的准确、透明和公平.
The justice of the Internet judiciary is an important aspect of judicial modernization.Internet courts,online litigation,and artificial intelligence judiciary constitute the basic appearance of contemporary Internet judiciary,and the diversified forms bring about the demand for differential justice and the requirement of coherence demonstration.First,what the Internet judiciary changes is the supply mode of judicial public service resources.Its allocation should not only implement the principle of demand and proportionality to improve the efficiency and convenience of Internet judiciary on the instrumental role,but also achieve Internet governance and implement the principle of equality and contribution to realize the distributive justice of new judicial resources on the functional role through administrative justice function such as Internet courts.Second,online litigation dominated by Internet technology has changed the judicial venue and correspondingly changed the way of procedural participation and control of the parties.On the one hand,online litigation needs to follow the norm standard of traditional procedural justice,and on the other hand,it needs to enhance society's trust in the proceedings and results through the social evaluation mechanism contained in subjective procedural justice.Third,the application of algorithms and blockchain in artificial intelligence makes it possible to automate the judgment of specific matters.While copying the'appearance'of human judges to assist or replace judicial judgment,it is necessary to ensure accuracy,transparency and fairness,as well as establish the correction system and post-review mechanism.

王福华

展开 >

上海交通大学凯原法学院

互联网司法 在线诉讼 人工智能司法 数字正义

2024

中国法学
中国法学会

中国法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:6.241
ISSN:1003-1707
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 1
  • 59