首页|论人工智能生成内容的著作权法平等保护

论人工智能生成内容的著作权法平等保护

扫码查看
在人工智能时代,人机互动已成为许多作品的常见创作方式,著作权法平等保护就是对人工智能生成内容(AIGC)与人类作品给予相同的制度评价,为此需要解决人工智能生成内容的可版权性问题与著作权归属问题.人工智能生成内容与人类作品在客体外观上具有一致性、在经济利益上具有同质性且符合著作权法激励创新的制度目的,这些是二者得以获得平等保护的前提基础.通过著作权法平等保护,可以降低法律制度摩擦成本、打造统一的著作权交易市场、鼓励标识真实来源并塑造人工智能生成内容市场价值.著作权法平等保护的实现可借鉴法律主体利益实体功能与法律推理功能分离的规范原理,参照著作权二元主体结构机制,将人工智能拟制为形式主体并使著作权利益向人类集中.具体而言,可发挥人工智能形式主体的法律推理功能,将人机互动视为一个创作整体,进而证成人工智能生成内容的独创性,并通过共同创作、委托创作等既有著作权法律关系的权属规则将著作权原始分配给人工智能的人类使用者.
In the era of artificial intelligence,human-machine interaction has become the main creation form.However,the equal protection of AI-generated content(AIGC)implies treating it the same as human-created works.And it is necessary to address the issues of copyrightability and ownership of AIGC.In theory,AIGC is consistent with human works in terms of external appearance,economic benefits,and goal to incentivize innovation,which become the foundational premise for equal protection.In practice,equal protection could reduce the frictional costs of legal systems,with a unified copyright market.Drawing on the functional roles of legal entities and legal reasoning,and inspired by the dual-entity structure with separate author and owner in copyright law,this approach aims to establish a legal framework where the interests of copyright belong to humans while conceptualizing AI as a formal legal entity.By leveraging the legal reasoning function of the AI as a formal entity,human-AI interaction could be perceived as a unity,serving as a source of originality for AIGC.Through the application of joint creation,commissioned creation,or other rules,copyright could be allocated to the human users of AI initially.

徐小奔

展开 >

中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心

中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心法学院

AIGC 独创性来源 著作权主体 著作权归属

2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目

22JJD820030

2024

中国法学
中国法学会

中国法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:6.241
ISSN:1003-1707
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 3
  • 55