首页|论垄断行为的竞合

论垄断行为的竞合

扫码查看
《反垄断法》对垄断行为的认定边界模糊,对作为关键构成要件的"排除限制竞争效果"也缺乏解释,导致垄断行为竞合的现象大量存在.垄断行为竞合引发三个问题,即需要认定何种垄断行为、需要认定几种垄断行为、是否可以提起多个诉讼.以规范法学中的竞合理论为基础,结合关于"排除限制竞争效果"的经济学理论和执法经验,可将垄断行为竞合分为三类处理:实质不竞合属于法条对立的范畴,应当选择最为恰当的法条适用;法条竞合应按照特殊法优先的原则认定一个垄断行为,也可通过修法进行消除;想象竞合构成多种垄断行为,在行政执法中择一处罚即可,在民事诉讼中虽成立多个请求权但仅构成一个诉讼.
Neither does the Anti-monopoly Law clearly delineate the boundaries of all monopolistic conduct,nor does it concretely explain the key condition,namely excluding or restricting competition effect.This results in tremendous concurrence of monopolistic conduct in theory,and also causes such disputes in practice.There are three questions raised thereby,namely what monopolistic conduct should apply,how many types of monopolistic conduct should be identified,and whether it is possible to file multiple lawsuits.Based on the theories on concurrence in criminal law and civil law,as well as the economics theories and the empirical practice on the excluding or restrictive competition effects,the concurrence of monopolistic conduct may be divided into three types:essential non-concurrence involves two conflicting rules,and must be handled with the most suitable one;apparent concurrence should be considered as single monopolistic conduct based on the principle of lex specialis,or can also be eliminated by modifying the Anti-monopoly Law;perfect concurrence,which constitutes multiple monopolistic conduct,should be resolved by only one in administrative procedures,and can only be sued in one procedure in civil litigation,though forming multiple locus standi.

侯利阳

展开 >

上海交通大学凯原法学院

垄断行为 竞合 行为类型化 排除限制竞争效果 保护法益

2022年度国家社科基金重点项目

22AFX018

2024

中国法学
中国法学会

中国法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:6.241
ISSN:1003-1707
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 31