首页|论技术范式转移下元宇宙的法律治理

论技术范式转移下元宇宙的法律治理

扫码查看
元宇宙实践中从Web2到Web3的技术范式转移,其表象是"中心化"与"去中心化"的技术标准之争,本质上则揭示了元宇宙实践中围绕虚拟世界的治理权力展开的多方博弈.深度数字化时代虚拟空间的发展方向集中体现为互联网巨头主导的元宇宙实践与去中心化自治组织主导的元宇宙实践共存共生,二者均可能在不同维度上侵害个体的数字权利,并给现实世界中主权国家的治理权力带来挑战.应准确评估不同形态的元宇宙虚拟空间的现实风险,并区分不同情境有针对性地制定法律规则,系统构建元宇宙的法律治理路径.公权力应强化对科技巨头的反垄断和对去中心化领域的监管,贯彻中心化与去中心化动态平衡的治理理念,建构基于元宇宙底层技术和应用场景的多元共治的治理体系,探索事前介入、合法性监管以及"法律代码化"的治理方式,明确刑法的理性介入为元宇宙实践划定的治理底线.
The technological paradigm shift from Web2 to Web3 in the practice of the metaverse appears as a dispute between'centralized'and'decentralized'technological standards,essentially revealing a multi-party struggle over governance of the virtual world.In the era of deep digitalization,development direction of virtual spaces is embodied in the coexistence and coevolution of metaverse practices led by Internet giants and those driven by decentralized autonomous organizations.Both may infringe upon individual digital rights in different dimensions and challenge the governance of sovereign states in the real world.Therefore,it is crucial to accurately assess the risks of different metaverse models,formulate targeted legal frameworks according to different situations,and systematically construct legal governance pathways for the metaverse.Public authorities should enhance anti-monopoly efforts of technology giants and oversight of decentralized domains.Specific pathways involve implementing the governance concept of a dynamic balance between centralization and decentralization,building a multi-party co-governance system based on the underlying technology and application scenarios of the metaverse,exploring governance methods like prior intervention as well as legality supervision and'legal codification',and clarifying the bottom line of metaverse governance through the rational intervention of criminal law.

马永强

展开 >

吉林大学人权研究院

元宇宙 技术范式转移 法律治理 数字化 去中心化

2023年度国家社科基金青年项目

23CFX041

2024

中国法学
中国法学会

中国法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:6.241
ISSN:1003-1707
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 26