Clinical Research Graduates'Subjective Evaluation and Improvement Suggestions for the Clinical Research Design and Implementation Course
Objective:To investigate clinical research graduates'subjective evaluation for the Clinical Research Design and Implementation course in order to optimize the course content and improve teaching quality.Methods:A questionnaire survey was conducted among 315 enrolled graduate students,including their basic information,research experience,subjective evaluation of course effectiveness,and course satisfaction.Results:Before the course,over 80%of students encountered difficulties in understanding aspects such as power analysis,bias control,bias identification,sample size estimation,and statistical analysis design.After the course,over 90%of students had mastered the aforementioned content.96.19%of students believed that the course design was scientifically sound and practical,while only 48.89%considered the course to be interesting.Conclusion:The Clinical Research Design and Implementation course has been widely recognized,but improvements are needed in course content,duration,and its interest value.