基于Meta分析的SPOC与传统课堂教学对高校医学教育影响效果对比研究
Comparative Study of the Effects of SPOC and Traditional Classroom Teaching on Medical Education Based on Meta-Analysis
黄徐瑞 1赵敏 1周亮 1郑贝贝 1许轶洲1
作者信息
- 1. 浙江中医药大学第四临床医学院,西湖大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院,浙江杭州 310006
- 折叠
摘要
目的:系统评价后疫情时代小规模限制性在线课程(SPOC)与传统课堂对医学院校教学效果的影响.方法:本研究检索2000年1月至2021年6月期间在中国知网、万方和维普等大型数据库中有关SPOC和传统课堂在我国医学生课程中的使用文献,采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行Meta分析.结果:共纳入9篇文献,995名教学对象.接受SPOC教学的学生与接受传统课堂教学的学生考试成绩[SMD=0.74,95％CI(0.58,0.90)]、学习积极性及兴趣[OR=5.39,95％CI(3.38,8.60)]和教学满意度[OR=4.68,95％CI(2.87,7.66)]存在显著差异(P＜0.00001).与传统课堂相比,SPOC更有利于学生考试成绩的提升,且学生在SPOC教学中的学习兴趣和满意度均显著更高.结论:SPOC在医学院校中的教学效果优于传统课堂.
Abstract
Objective:To systematically evaluate the impact of Small Private Online Courses(SPOC)versus traditional classroom teaching on medical education in the post-pandemic era.Methods:This study searched literature from January 2000 to June 2021 in major databases such as CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP regarding the use of SPOC and traditional classroom teaching in medical schools in China.Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software.Results:A total of 9 studies involving 995 participants were included.Students receiving SPOC teaching had significantly better exam scores SMD=0.74,95％CI(0.58,0.90),higher learning enthusiasm and interest OR=5.39,95％CI(3.38,8.60),and greater teaching satisfaction OR=4.68,95％CI(2.87,7.66)compared to those receiving traditional classroom teaching(P＜0.00001).Compared to traditional classroom teaching,SPOC is more effective in improving students'exam scores,and students show significantly higher interest and satisfaction in SPOC teaching.Conclusion:SPOC has a superior teaching effect in medical schools compared to traditional classroom teaching.
关键词
SPOC/医学/教学效果/Meta分析Key words
SPOC/Medical education/Teaching effectiveness/Meta-analysis引用本文复制引用
基金项目
浙江中医药大学2020年度教育教学改革研究项目(GJ20018)
教育部2023年度产学合作协同育人项目(230803260084544)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据