首页|基于Markov模型结直肠癌筛查策略卫生经济学评价

基于Markov模型结直肠癌筛查策略卫生经济学评价

扫码查看
目的 构建结直肠癌筛查的Markov决策模型,评价各筛查策略长期运行后的成本效果,确定优势筛查策略,为完善结直肠癌筛查项目提供理论参考.方法 构建Markov决策模型,分别以40、45和50岁为筛查开始年龄,59、64、69和74岁为筛查结束年龄,筛查间隔分别为1年和2年,共模拟包括不筛查在内的25种筛查策略;通过整理文献提取出结直肠癌自然史模型所需概率、筛查成本和医疗成本等数据,将数据带入模型,以1年为循环周期,通过多个周期循环预测不同结直肠癌筛查策略的卫生经济学效果.结果 模拟个体水平的成本效果分析显示,成本最低的筛查策略为50-74-1(50岁开始筛查至74岁结束每年筛查1次),消耗的社会成本为48.31万元,获得17.82生命年(LY)、16.76个质量调整生命年(QALY),以LY为结局指标时的成本效果比(CER)为2.71万元/LY,以QALY为结局指标时的CER为2.88万元/QALY;回乘分析结果显示,筛查策略45-74-1(45岁开始筛查至74岁结束每年筛查1次)的支出效果比最佳,消耗的成本为51.52万元,获得19.49个LY、18.37个QALY,以LY为结局指标时的CER为2.64万元/LY、增量成本效果比(ICER)为1.92万元/LY,以QALY为结局指标时的CER为2.80万元/QALY、ICER为1.99万元/QALY;取得最好效果的筛查策略为40-74-1(40岁开始筛查至74岁结束每年筛查1次),消耗的社会成本为55.17万元,获得20.97个LY、19.78个QALY,以LY为结局指标时的CER为2.63万元/LY、ICER为2.47万元/LY,以QALY为结局指标时的CER为2.79万元/QALY、ICER为2.60万元/QALY.湖北省武汉市现行结直肠癌筛查策略为45-59-2(45岁开始筛查至59岁结束每2年筛查1次),消耗的社会成本为103.51万元,获得18.97个LY(16.8个QALY);比武汉市现行结直肠癌筛查策略更为经济的策略为45-74-1,可节约51.99万元并新增0.52个LY(1.57个QALY);当考虑效果最大原则,40-74-1筛查策略较武汉市现行的结直肠癌筛查策略可节约48.34万元并新增2.00个LY(2.98个QALY).结论 在经济状况理想情况下,可优先选择效果最大的策略(40-74-1);在经济资源有限的情况下,可优先考虑支出效果比最佳的筛查策略(45-74-1).
Health economic evaluation of different colorectal cancer screening strategies in Hubei province:a Markov simulation analysis based on local cancer registration and domestic study data
Objective To construct a Markov decision model for colorectal cancer screening,evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies,determine the optimal screening strategy,and provide a theoretical reference for improving colorectal cancer screening programs.Methods A Markov decision model was constructed to simulate 25 screening strategies,including no screening,with screening start ages of 40,45,and 50 years,end ages of 59,64,69,and 74 years,and screening intervals of 1 and 2 years.Data on the probabilities,screening costs,and medical costs required for the colorectal cancer natural history model were extracted from the Hubei Provincial Cancer Registration(2020)/Mortality Surveillance(2013-2017)dataset and the literature review and entered into the model.With a cycle length of 1 year,the health economic impact of different colorectal cancer screening strategies was predicted over multiple cycles.Results The cost-effectiveness analysis at the individual level showed that the screening strategy with the lowest cost was 50-74-1(annual primary screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood testing[iFOBT]and then required colonoscopy from 50 to 74 years of age),which cost 483 100 Chinese yuan(CNY)in social costs,gained 17.82 life-years(LY)and 16.76 quality-adjusted life-years(QALY),with a cost-effectiveness ratio(CER)of 27 100 CNY/LY and 28 800 CNY/QALY,using LY and QALY as outcome measures,respectively.The payback analysis showed that the 45-74-1 strategy(annual primary screening with iFOBT and then required colonoscopy from age 50 to 74 years)had the best cost-effectiveness ratio,consuming 515 200 CNY,gaining 19.49 LY and 18.37 QALY,with a CER of 26 400 yuan/LY and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)of 19 200 yuan/LY when using LY as the outcome measure,and a CER of 28 000 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 19 900 CNY/QALY when using QALY as the outcome measure.The strategy with the highest effect was 40-74-1(annual screening from age 40 to 74),which cost 551 700 CNY in social costs and gained 20.97 LY and 19.78 QALYs,with a CER of 26 300 CNY/LY and an ICER of 24 700 CNY/LY using LY as the outcome measure,and a CER of 27 900 CNY/QALY and an ICER of 26 000 CNY/QALY using QALY as the outcome measure.The current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan,Hubei province,is 45-59-2(biennial screening from age 45 to 59),which costs CNY 1 035 100 in social costs and gains 18.97 LY(16.8 QALY).The 45-74-1 strategy is more economical than the current strategy in Wuhan,saving 519 900 CNY and gaining an additional 0.52 LY(1.57 QALY).Considering the principle of maximum effect,the 40-74-1 screening strategy can save 483 400 CNY and gain an additional 2.00 LY(2.98 QALY)compared with the current colorectal cancer screening strategy in Wuhan.Conclusion Under ideal economic conditions,the strategy(40-74-1)with the greatest effect can be prioritized;under limited economic resources,the screening strategy(45-74-1)with the best cost-effectiveness ratio can be prioritized.

colorectal cancerscreening strategyhealth economic evaluationMarkov model

季杰、汪宇盈、卓端、刘雨晗、彭佳茜、蒋睿婧芳、吴昊、刘嵩、赵立见、汪建、毛冰、朱师达、陶红兵

展开 >

华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,武汉 430030

深圳华大基因股份有限公司,深圳 518083

华中科技大学协和江南医院,武汉 430200

武汉市第一医院,武汉 430022

华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉市中心医院,武汉 430014

华中科技大学文科双一流建设重大学科平台(公立医院高质量发展研究中心),武汉 430030

展开 >

结直肠癌 筛查策略 卫生经济学评价 Markov模型

2024

中国公共卫生
中华预防医学会

中国公共卫生

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.404
ISSN:1001-0580
年,卷(期):2024.40(11)