首页|六西格玛管理在血培养标本分析前质量控制中的应用

六西格玛管理在血培养标本分析前质量控制中的应用

扫码查看
目的 应用六西格玛管理方法,提高临床血培养标本送检质量。方法 某三级甲等综合医院于2022年8月开始运用六西格玛管理对临床血培养标本送检流程进行干预,采用自身前后对照试验,将2021年8月—2022年2月设为干预前阶段,2022年8月-2023年2月设为干预后阶段,比较干预前后血培养送检方式构成比、血培养阳性率及污染率、血培养标本合格率。结果 干预前后血培养送检分别为2577例次、2554例次,血培养单套及≥双套送检率、血培养阳性率干预前分别为87。66%、11。49%、9。24%,干预后分别为28。93%、69。97%、12。88%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。001);血培养单瓶送检率、血培养污染率、血培养标本合格率干预前分别为0。85%、0。74%、99。92%,干预后分别为1。10%、1。21%、100。00%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 通过六西格玛管理规范了临床血培养标本的送检方式和采样方法,进一步提高了临床血培养标本送检质量。
Application of six sigma management on pre-analytical quality control of blood culture samples
Objective To improve the quality of clinical blood culture samples delivery by applying six sigma management methods.Methods A tertiary general hospital started to use six sigma management to intervene in the clinical blood culture samples delivery process in August 2022,using its own before and after control test,setting August 2021-February 2022 as the pre-intervention phase and August 2022-February 2023 as the post-intervention phase,to investigate and compare the composition ratio of pre-intervention blood culture delivery methods.The blood culture positivity rate,blood culture contamination rate,and blood culture samples pass rate,composition ratio of blood culture delivery methods,blood culture positivity rate,blood culture contamination rate and blood culture samples pass rate were compared between pre-intervention and post-intervention.Results The pre-intervention and post-intervention blood culture delivery samples were 2 577 and 2 554 cases,respectively.The rates of single and ≥ double sets of blood culture for testing and positive blood culture before intervention were 87.66%,11.49%and 9.24%,respectively.After intervention,the rates were 28.93%,69.97%and 12.88%,respectively,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.001).The rate of single bottle of blood culture delivery,blood culture contamination rate,blood culture samples qualified rate before the intervention were 0.85%,0.74%,99.92%,respectively.After intervention,the rates were 1.10%,1.21%and 100.00%,respectively,the difference were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Six sigma management standardized the delivery and sampling methods of clinical blood culture samples,and further improved the quality of clinical blood culture specimen delivery.

Six sigmaBlood cultureQuality of deliveryEffectiveness evaluation

申思蓉、吴晓英、沈正泽

展开 >

重庆医科大学附属永川医院医院感染控制科,重庆 402160

重庆医科大学附属永川医院医院药剂科,重庆 402160

六西格玛 血液培养 送检质量 效果评价

重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目重庆医科大学附属永川医院研究生创新基金资助项目

2022MSXM047YJSCX202209

2024

中国国境卫生检疫杂志
中国质检报刊社

中国国境卫生检疫杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.415
ISSN:1004-9770
年,卷(期):2024.47(1)
  • 21