摘要
目的 比较不同的伊蚊监测方法在监测中的相关性与结果对应关系,为合理选择监测方法提供依据.方法 2021年8-10月、2022年5-10月在深圳市龙华区6个街道的55个点同时用布雷图指数法、诱蚊诱卵器法、双层叠帐法、人诱停落法、BG-Trap法对居民区和公园的伊蚊进行监测,采用相关样本非参数检验及ROC曲线进行统计分析.结果 布雷图指数法监测数据小于诱蚊诱卵器法,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.000 1);双层叠帐法的数据小于诱蚊诱卵器法、人诱停落法、BG-Trap法,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.000 1);诱蚊诱卵器法与人诱停落法、BG-Trap法的监测数据差异均无统计学意义(P=0.096,P=0.211).在现有评价指标下,部分监测方法能找到与之对应的值.BI=5,对应MOI=7.42;MOI=10,对应BI=6.50;双层叠帐法帐诱指数0.9(或2),对应的人诱停落法停落指数、BG-Trap法诱蚊指数分别为7.00、5.00;双层叠帐法帐诱指数4,对应的人诱停落法停落指数、BG-Trap法诱蚊指数分别为7.00、9.00;双层叠帐法帐诱指数6,对应的人诱停落法停落指数、BG-Trap法诱蚊指数分别为11.00、9.00.结论 在深圳市监测伊蚊成蚊时,可从及时性、可及性、安全性、客观性等不同方面综合考虑,选用不同的监测方法.
Abstract
Objective To compare the correlation and corresponding relationship of 5 different Aedes mosquito surveillance methods,and to provide basis for the reasonable selection of surveillance method.Methods From August to October 2021,May to October 2022,the Breteau index method,mosq-ovitraph method,double mosquito net method,human-baited landing method and BG-Trap method were used to simultaneously collect Aedes mosquitoes in residential areas and parks in 55 sites of 6 streets in Longhua District,Shenzhen.Non-parametric test and ROC curve were used for statistical analysis.Results The surveillance data of Breteau index method was lower than that of mosq-ovitrap method,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.000 1).The data of double mosquito net method was lower than mosq-ovitraph method,human-baited landing method and BG-Trap method,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.000 1).No significant difference between the surveillance data of mosq-ovitraph method and human-baited landing method,BG-Trap(P=0.096,P=0.211).Under the existing evaluation indexes,some surveillance methods could find corresponding values,BI=5,corresponding to MOI=7.42,MOI=10,corresponding to BI=6.50.The trap index of double mosquito net method was 0.9(or 2),the index of human-baited landing method and BG-Trap method were 7.00 and 5.00 respectively.The trap index of double mosquito net method was 4 or 6,and the index of human-baited landing method and BG-Trap method were 7.00 and 9.00,or 11.00 and 9.00 respectively.Conclusion In the surveillance of adult Aedes mosquito in Shenzhen,different methods could be selected based on timeliness,accessibility,safety and objectivity.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据