首页|综合干预措施在提高住院患者抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率中的作用

综合干预措施在提高住院患者抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率中的作用

扫码查看
目的 了解某院通过实施综合干预措施后住院患者抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检情况,为后续制定针对性措施提供参考依据。方法 选取该院治疗性使用抗菌药物的住院患者为研究对象,其中2022年1-5月的住院患者为干预前组,2022年6-10月采取各项综合性干预措施,2022年11月—2023年3月的住院患者为干预后组,分析干预前后住院患者抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率、无菌标本送检比率、抗菌药物使用率、重点监测的多重耐药菌检出率。结果 与干预前相比,干预后住院患者抗菌药物治疗前病原学送检率(62。09%VS 74。04%)、医院感染诊断相关病原学送检率(62。82%VS 92。73%)、无菌标本送检比率(35。17%VS 41。06%)均明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05);干预后重点抗菌药物联用前病原学送检率(93。33%)与干预前(90。48%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);干预后的抗菌药物使用率(39。93%)低于干预前(44。95%),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);干预前后重点监测的多重耐药菌检出率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05)。结论 采取科学合理的干预措施可以提高病原学送检率,为抗菌药物合理使用提供一定的参考依据;但重点药物联用前的病原学送检率及重点监测的多重耐药菌检出率未有明显改善,说明相关措施还需进一步优化。
The role of comprehensive intervention measures in improving the patho-gen detection rate of hospitalized patients before antimicrobial therapy
Objective To understand the pathogen detection of hospitalized patients before antimicrobial therapy in a hospital through implementation of comprehensive intervention measures,and provide reference basis for the de-velopment of targeted measures.Methods Hospitalized patients who received therapeutic antimicrobial agents in this hospital were selected as the research subjects.Patients who were hospitalized from January to May 2022 were selected as the pre-intervention group,comprehensive intervention measures were taken from June to October 2022,and those who were hospitalized from November 2022 to March 2023 were selected as the post-intervention group.The pathogen detection rate before antimicrobial therapy,sterile specimen detection rate,antimicrobial use rate,de-tection rate of key multidrug-resistant organisms of patients before and after the intervention were analyzed.Results Compared to before intervention,the proportion of pathogen detection rate before antimicrobial therapy(62.09%vs 74.04%),detection rate of healthcare-associated infection diagnosis-related pathogens(62.82%vs 92.73%),and sterile specimen detection rate(35.17%vs 41.06%)of hospitalized patients after intervention all increased signifi-cantly,with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).After intervention,pathogen detection rate before the combination use of key antimicrobial agents was not statistically different from before intervention(93.33%vs 90.48%,P>0.05),while antimicrobial use rate was lower than before intervention(39.93%vs 44.95%,P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of key multidrug-resistant organisms be-fore and after intervention(all P>0.05).Conclusion Adopting scientific and rational intervention measures can improve the pathogen detection rate,provide a reference basis for the rational use of antimicrobial agents.There was no significant improvement in the pathogen detection rate before the combination use of key antimicrobial agents and the detection rate of key multidrug-resistant organisms,indicating that relevant measures still need to be further optimized.

pathogenic detection rateantimicrobial agentbefore therapyintervention measurehealthcare-associated infection

李阅历、崔金兰、梅兰娟、刘秋淳、田菊芳

展开 >

秀山县人民医院感控科,重庆 409900

秀山县中医医院医院感染管理科,重庆 409900

病原学送检率 抗菌药物 治疗前 干预措施 医院感染

2024

中国感染控制杂志
中南大学

中国感染控制杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.112
ISSN:1671-9638
年,卷(期):2024.23(3)
  • 30