首页|基于FMEA管理模式的风险评估在医院感染防控中应用效果的Meta分析

基于FMEA管理模式的风险评估在医院感染防控中应用效果的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)管理模式在医院感染防控中的应用效果.方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、the Cochrane Library、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)中FMEA管理模式在医院感染防控中应用的相关文献,由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并进行交叉核对,采用ROB工具对纳入的随机对照研究进行风险及质量评价,采用NOS量表对纳入的队列研究进行评分,应用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入22项研究,42 815例患者,其中FMEA管理模式组21 784例,对照组21 031例.Meta分析结果显示,FMEA管理模式组医院感染发病率低于对照组[OR=0.31,95%CI(0.24,0.40)];与常规管理模式相比,FMEA管理模式组表浅手术切口感染发病率[OR=0.53,95%CI(0.36,0.78)]、呼吸系统感染发病率[OR=0.44,95%CI(0.35,0.56)]、泌尿系统感染发病率[OR=0.45,95%CI(0.38,0.53)]及血液系统感染发病率[OR=0.29,95%CI(0.18,0.45)]更低(均P<0.01).结论 FMEA管理模式在医院感染防控中的应用,能够降低医院感染发病率,应在医院管理中积极推广应用.
Application efficacy of FMEA management model-based risk assessment in prevention and control of healthcare-associated infection:a Meta-analysis
Objective To systematically evaluate the application efficacy of failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)management mode in the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infection(HAI).Methods Li-terature on the application of FMEA management mode in HAI prevention and control were retrieved from PubMed,Embase,the Cochrane Library,China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),VIP Database,Wanfang Data-base,and China Biomedical Literature Database(CBM).Two researchers independently screened the literature,ex-tracted data,and conducted cross checking.Risk and quality assessments were performed on the included studies of randomized controlled trials by ROB tool,the included cohort studies were scored by Newcastle-Ottawa(NOS)scale,and Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.4 software.Results A total of 22 studies involving 42 815 patients were included in the analysis,with 21 784 in the FMEA management mode group and 21 031 in the control group.Meta-analysis results showed that the incidence of HAI in the FMEA management mode group was lower than that in the control group(OR=0.31,95%CI[0.24,0.40]).Compared with the conventional management mode,incidences of superficial surgical site infection(OR=0.53,95%CI[0.36,0.78]),respiratory system infec-tion(OR=0.44,95%CI[0.35,0.56]),urinary system infection(OR=0.45,95%CI[0.38,0.53]),and blood system infection(OR=0.29,95%CI[0.18,0.45])in the FMEA management mode group were all lower(all P<0.01).Conclusion The application of FMEA management mode in HAI prevention and control can reduce the inci-dence of HAI,which should be actively promoted in hospital management.

risk assessmentFMEA management modehealthcare-associated infection managementinfection prevention and controlMeta-analysis

蔡玲、郭康乐、王燕、张映华、樊玉清、张肖红、胡兰文、杨亚红、张浩军

展开 >

甘肃省人民医院感染管理科,甘肃兰州 730000

甘肃省第二人民医院院长办公室,甘肃兰州 730000

风险评估 FMEA管理模式 医院感染管理 感染防控 Meta分析

2024

中国感染控制杂志
中南大学

中国感染控制杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.112
ISSN:1671-9638
年,卷(期):2024.23(11)