首页|负压封闭引流技术对跟骨骨折L形切口愈合的临床效果评估

负压封闭引流技术对跟骨骨折L形切口愈合的临床效果评估

扫码查看
目的 比较负压封闭引流与常规引流对跟骨骨折切开复位 L 形切口愈合的影响.方法 本研究前瞻性分析 2019 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月 71 例跟骨骨折患者,随机分为负压封闭引流组(VSD 组)36 例,常规引流组(对照组)35 例.VSD 组患者在术后进行负压封闭引流,维持负压在-0.02~0.04 MPa 并持续吸引 7~10 天.对照组患者在术后常规放置引流管,计量引流情况并于术后 48~72 h 拔出引流管.采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评估两组患者的疼痛程度.两组患者术后随访 3 个月,观察并记录切口愈合情况、引流液情况,于术后 3 个月采用 Maryland 量表评估足功能恢复情况.结果 平均切口愈合时间:VSD 组(16.361±2.045)天,对照组(19.886±2.040)天;平均住院时间:VSD 组(20.832±5.002)天,对照组(24.609±4.876)天(P<0.05).与对照组相比,VSD 组的切口愈合等级更高(P=0.000),切口并发症的发生率更低(8.333%vs.37.143%)(P=0.000).引流量:VSD 组(183.438±34.293)ml,远高于对照组(74.076±27.418)ml(P=0.000).引流液细菌培养阳性率:VSD 组 2.778%低于对照组 17.143%(P=0.009).术后 1 周,VAS 疼痛评分:VSD 组(3.642±1.492),明显小于对照组(4.751±1.567)(P=0.003).术后 3 个月,Maryland 足功能评分:VSD 组(84.972±5.690),优于对照组(76.857±7.554)(P<0.05).结论 负压封闭引流技术可以有效降低切口感染和切口并发症的发生率并促进切口愈合,减轻患者术后疼痛,缩短切口愈合时间和平均住院时间,最终促进跟骨骨折术后足功能的恢复.
Evaluation of the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage technique in promoting the healing of the L incision in root bone fractures
Objective To compare the effects of vacuum sealing drainage with conventional drainage on the healing of L incisions in calcaneal fractures.Methods From June 2019 to June 2023,71 patients with calcaneal fracture were randomly divided into vacuum sealing drainage group(36 cases)and control group(35 cases)in this prospective study.Patients in the vacuum sealing drainage group underwent negative pressure occlusion drainage after surgery,maintaining negative pressure at-0.02-0.04 MPa and continuous attraction for 7-10 days.The control group was routinely placed with drainage tubes after surgery,and the drainage tubes were extracted 48 to 72 hours after surgery according to the drainage situation.The visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to assess the pain level of the two groups.The two groups were followed up for 3 months after surgery.The incision healing and drainage fluid were observed and recorded,and the Maryland scale was used to evaluate the recovery of foot function 3 months after surgery.Results The mean incision healing time[(16.361±2.045)d vs.(19.886±2.040)d]and average hospital stay[(20.832±5.002)d vs.(24.609±4.876)d]were shorter in vacuum sealing drainage group than those in the control group(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the vacuum sealing drainage group had a higher grade of incision healing(P=0.000)and a lower incidence of incision complications[8.333%vs.37.143%](P=0.004).The volume of drainage fluid of the vacuum sealing drainage group was more than that of the control group[(183.438±34.293)ml vs.(74.076±27.418)ml](P=0.000).The positive rate of bacterial culture of drainage fluid was lower than that of the control group[2.778%vs.17.173%](P=0.009).One week after surgery,the VAS pain score in the negative pressure occlusion drainage group was significantly lower than that in the control group[(3.642±1.492)vs.(4.751±1.567)](P=0.003).Three months after surgery,Maryland's foot function score in the vacuum sealing drainage group was better than that of the control group[(84.972±5.690)vs.(76.857±7.554)](P<0.05).Conclusions The vacuum sealing drainage can reduce incision infection rates,incidence of adverse events as well as postoperative pain,and promote incision healing,shorten incision healing time and mean hospital stay,and ultimately promote the recovery of foot function after calcaneus fracture surgery.

CalcaneusFractures,boneDrainage therapyNegative-pressure wound therapyVacuum sealing drainage

赖建鸿、陈宇斐、林文、廖烨明、阮龙辉

展开 >

528231 广东省,佛山市南海区第五人民医院足踝外科

跟骨 骨折 切口愈合 引流疗法 负压伤口疗法 负压封闭引流技术

2022年佛山市自筹经费类科技创新项目

2220001005541

2024

中国骨与关节杂志
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会,北京中科康辰骨关节伤病研究所

中国骨与关节杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.665
ISSN:2095-252X
年,卷(期):2024.13(9)