首页|经股骨颈打压植骨治疗ARCO Ⅱ/Ⅲ期非创伤性股骨头坏死——一项10年以上的随访研究

经股骨颈打压植骨治疗ARCO Ⅱ/Ⅲ期非创伤性股骨头坏死——一项10年以上的随访研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨经股骨颈打压植骨治疗年轻患者国际骨循环研究会(Association Research Circulation Osseous,ARCO)Ⅱ/Ⅲ 期非创伤性股骨头坏死(osteonecrosis of the femoral head,ONFH)的长期疗效,并分析影响该术式远期临床疗效的主要因素.方法 纳入 2006 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月于我院接受治疗的 53 例 ARCOⅡ 和 Ⅲ 期的 ONFH 患者(55 髋),其中男 49 髋,女 6 髋;年龄 18~59 岁,平均 34.5 岁.所有患者均接受经股骨颈打压植骨手术,比较术前和末次随访的 Harris 髋关节评分(Harris hip score,HHS)和疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),并记录影像学改变情况以及所有患者全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)的转换率,分析不同的分期和分型特点与远期失败后全髋置换的关系.结果 本组随访时间 10.0~14.3 年,平均 12.2 年;末次随访与术前相比,HHS 功能评分分别从 71.7±13.8 提高到 82.4±17.0(P=0.000);而 VAS疼痛评分则从 4.5±0.9 降到 2.4±1.3(P=0.000).THA 转化率为 25.5%(14 髋).日本骨坏死研究会(Japanese Investigation Committee,JIC)分型的 C2 型和 Kerboul 分类中联合坏死角≥240° 与远期失败后转化为 THA 密切相关(P=0.000).结论 经股骨颈打压植骨治疗 ARCO Ⅱ 和 Ⅲ 期的 ONFH 长期临床疗效尚可,具有较高的保髋成功率.手术成功的关键在于恰当的病例选择和准确的手术技术,而对于股骨头塌陷较重、外侧柱严重受累、联合坏死角较大的患者保髋成功率较低,远期效果不佳,应谨慎选择经股骨颈打压植骨手术.
Surgical treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in ARCO Ⅱ/Ⅲ stage with impaction bone grafting via femoral neck:a follow-up study over 10 years
Objective To investigate the long-term efficacy of femoral neck compression grafting for the treatment of young patients with ARCO stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head(ONFH),and to analyze the main factors influencing the long-term clinical outcomes of this procedure.Methods A total of 53 patients(55 hips)with ARCO stage Ⅱ and Ⅲ ONFH who received treatment at our hospital from January 2006 to June 2012 were included in the study,comprising 49 hips in males and 6 hips in females.The age range was 18 to 59 years,with an average age of 34.5 years.All patients underwent compression grafting surgery via the femoral neck.Harris hip scores(HHS)and visual analogue scale(VAS)pain scores were compared preoperatively and at the last follow-up.Radiological changes were recorded,and the conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty(THA)was analyzed in relation to different stages and types of ONFH.Results The average follow-up duration was 12.2 years(range:10.0-14.3 years).At the last follow-up compared to preoperatively,the HHS functional score improved from(71.7±13.8)to(82.4±17.0)(P=0.000),while the VAS score decreased from(4.5±0.9)to(2.4±1.3)(P=0.000).The THA conversion rate was 25.5%(14 hips).The C2 type in the JIC classification and a combined necrotic angle of≥240° in the Kerboul classification were closely associated with the conversion to total hip arthroplasty after long-term failure(P=0.000).Conclusions Compression grafting via the femoral neck for ARCO stageⅡ and Ⅲ ONFH shows acceptable long-term clinical outcomes with a high success rate for hip preservation.The key to surgical success lies in appropriate case selection and accurate surgical technique.However,for patients with severe femoral head collapse,significant involvement of the lateral column,and larger combined necrotic angles,the success rate for hip preservation is lower,and long-term outcomes are poor,thus warranting caution when selecting femoral neck compression grafting surgery.

Femur head necrosisHip preservationBone grafting

黄一健、李勇、张伟佳、孙大铭、张轶超、任宁涛、张振东、程徽、罗殿中、张洪

展开 >

100048 北京,中国人民解放军总医院第四医学中心关节外科

股骨头坏死 保髋 植骨

国家骨科与运动康复临床医学研究中心面上项目

2021-NCRC-CXJJ-ZH-09

2024

中国骨与关节杂志
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会,北京中科康辰骨关节伤病研究所

中国骨与关节杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.665
ISSN:2095-252X
年,卷(期):2024.13(10)