首页|关节镜与开放桡骨头成形术治疗桡骨头骨折引发肘关节僵硬的回顾性研究

关节镜与开放桡骨头成形术治疗桡骨头骨折引发肘关节僵硬的回顾性研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨肘关节镜下与开放术式治疗桡骨头骨折引发肘关节僵硬的疗效.方法 在本院肘关节外科治疗组的肘关节僵硬患者中,选取 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月由于桡骨头骨折行保守或手术治疗后产生桡骨头畸形愈合、异位骨化等并发症,导致桡骨头存在骨性阻挡的患者 47 例进行回顾分析.收集患者围术期资料,包括手术方式、桡骨头骨折改良 Mason 分型、术前与术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、肘关节屈伸和旋转活动度、Mayo 肘关节功能评分系统(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)评分以及术后并发症和二次手术,对比关节镜与开放桡骨头成形术两种手术方式的疗效.结果 共纳入 47 例,根据治疗方法不同,分为开放组(26 例)和关节镜组(21 例).男 29 例、女 18 例,平均年龄(34.70±7.90)岁,平均随访时间(15.19±3.86)个月,Mason Ⅰ 型 10 例、Ⅱ 型 20 例、Ⅲ 型 17 例.两组患者终末随访的肘关节活动度、VAS 评分和 MEPS 评分均有明显改善,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后 6 周关节镜组屈伸活动度(124.38±8.25)° 显著高于开放组(115.92±8.38)°,术后第 2 天和术后 6 周 VAS 评分关节镜组显著低于开放组[(4.48±1.12)vs.(5.88±1.14)、(3.48±1.08)vs.(4.19±1.90)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).关节镜组未发现感染、关节不稳、二次关节僵硬、异位骨化等并发症,开放组出现 2 例异位骨化,其中 1 例关节僵硬明显予以二次手术处理.结论 无论是开放还是肘关节镜桡骨头成形术均可处理由于桡骨头骨折引发的关节僵硬,并取得较满意的效果,肘关节镜具有创伤小、伤口美观、康复速度快等优势.
A retrospective study of arthroscopic versus open radial head plasty for the treatment of elbow stiffness due to radial head fracture
Objective To investigate and compare the therapeutic effects of arthroscopic and open surgery on elbow joint stiffness caused by radial head fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with elbow stiffness in the elbow joint surgical treatment group of our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022.Patients with skeletal obstruction of the radial head due to complications such as radial head malunion and ectopic ossification after conservative or surgical treatment of radial head fractures were selected.Collect perioperative data from patients,including surgical methods,modified Mason classification of radial head fractures,preoperative and postoperative pain VAS scores,elbow flexion extension and rotation range of motion,Mayo elbow performance score(MEPS)scores,postoperative complications,and secondary surgery rate,and compare the efficacy of arthroscopy and open radial head arthroplasty surgery.Results A total of 47 patients were included and divided into an open group(26 cases)and an arthroscopic group(21 cases)according to different treatment methods.There were 29 males and 18 females with an average age of(34.70±7.90)years and an average follow-up time of(15.19±3.86)months.There were 10 cases of Mason type Ⅰ,20 cases of Mason type Ⅱ,and 17 cases of Mason type Ⅱ.The elbow joint range of motion,VAS score,and MEPS score of both groups of patients showed significant improvement during the final follow-up,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).The flexion and extension range of motion(124.38±8.25)° in the arthroscopic group was significantly higher than that in the open group(115.92±8.38)° 6 weeks after surgery.On the second day and 6 weeks after surgery,the VAS scores in the arthroscopic group were significantly lower than those in the open group[(4.48±1.12)vs.(5.88±1.14),(3.48±1.08)vs.(4.19±1.90)],and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).No complications such as infection,joint instability,secondary joint stiffness,or ectopic ossification were found in the arthroscopic group,while 2 cases of ectopic ossification were observed in the open group,with 1 case of significant joint stiffness requiring secondary surgical treatment.Conclusions Both open and elbow arthroscopic radial head arthroplasty can treat joint stiffness caused by radial head fractures and achieve satisfactory results.Elbow arthroscopy has the advantages of minimal trauma,good wound appearance,and fast recovery.

Radius fracturesArthroscopesElbow jointOrthopedic procedures

王龑懋、陆晟迪、郁诗阳、丁坚

展开 >

200233 上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院

桡骨骨折 关节镜 肘关节 矫形外科手术

2024

中国骨与关节杂志
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会,北京中科康辰骨关节伤病研究所

中国骨与关节杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.665
ISSN:2095-252X
年,卷(期):2024.13(12)