首页|胸腰椎骨折患者经伤椎与跨伤椎内固定治疗效果比较

胸腰椎骨折患者经伤椎与跨伤椎内固定治疗效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较经伤椎与跨伤椎内固定术治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效.方法 选取我院 2022 年1-12 月收治的 96 例胸腰椎骨折患者.根据手术方式分为经伤椎组和跨伤椎组,每组各 48 例.比较两组患者围术期指标、影像学参数、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)以及日本骨科协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA).结果 经伤椎组术中失血量、手术时间高于跨伤椎组,住院时间低于跨伤椎组(P<0.05).经伤椎组围术期并发症发生率低于跨伤椎组(8.3%vs.22.9%,P=0.049).术后 3~6 个月和 9~12 个月时,经伤椎组患者局部椎体后凸角低于跨伤椎组(P<0.05);术后 9~12 个月,经伤椎组患者椎体楔角低于跨伤椎组(P<0.05),椎体前缘、中间和后缘高度均高于跨伤椎组(P<0.05);术后 2~3 周、3~6 个月和 9~12 个月,经伤椎组患者 VAS 评分均低于跨伤椎组患者(P<0.05);术后 3~6 个月和 9~12 个月,经伤椎组患者 ODI 均低于跨伤椎组患者(P<0.05);术后 2~3 个月、3~6 个月和 9~12 个月,经伤椎组患者 JOA高于跨伤椎组患者(P<0.05).结论 经伤椎与跨伤椎置钉内固定术均能有效治疗胸腰椎骨折.但经伤椎治疗的患者伤椎高度维持效果更好,且具有更好的治疗效果.
Comparison of the results of trans-injured and cross-injured internal fixation for patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of trans-injured and cross-injured internal fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.Methods Ninety-six patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture admitted between January 2022 and December 2022 in our hospital were selected.They were divided into trans-injured group and cross-injured group according to surgical methods,48 cases each.Perioperative indicators,radiological parameters,visual analogue scale(VAS),Oswestry disability index(ODI),and Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA)scores were compared between the two groups.Results Intraoperative blood loss and operation time were higher in the trans-injured group than that in the cross-injured group,and hospital stay was lower than in the cross-injured group(P<0.05).The perioperative complication rate was lower in the trans-injured group than that in the cross-injured group(8.3%vs.22.9%,P=0.049).At 3-6 months and 9-12 months postoperatively,the posterior convexity angle of the local vertebral body was lower in patients in the trans-injured group than in the cross-injured group(P<0.05);the vertebral body wedge angle was lower in patients in the trans-injured group than in the cross-injured spine group(P<0.05);the heights of the anterior,intermediate,and posterior vertebral bodies were higher than those in the cross-injured group at 9-12 months postoperatively(P<0.05).VAS was lower in patients in the trans-injured group than in the cross-injured group at 2-3 weeks postoperatively,3-6 months postoperatively,and 9-12 months postoperatively(P=0.05).ODI was lower in patients in the trans-injured group than in patients in the cross-injured group at 3-6 months postoperatively and at 9-12 months postoperatively(P<0.05).JOA was higher in patients in the trans-injured group than in patients in the cross-injured group at 2-3 weeks postoperatively,3-6 months postoperatively,and 9-12 months postoperative(P<0.05).Conclusions Both trans-injured and cross-injured internal fixation are effective in treating thoracolumbar spine fractures.However,trans-injured internal fixation has better maintenance of height,as well as better outcomes.

Spinal fracturesThoracic vertebraeLumbar vertebraeFracture fixation,internal

许小青、周宏亮、雷环宇、陈静

展开 >

226500 江苏省,如皋市中医院骨科

226500 江苏省,如皋市中医院手术室

脊柱骨折 胸椎 腰椎 骨折固定术,内

2024

中国骨与关节杂志
中国医疗保健国际交流促进会,北京中科康辰骨关节伤病研究所

中国骨与关节杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.665
ISSN:2095-252X
年,卷(期):2024.13(12)