Theoretical Dilemma of Global Climate Justice Practice in the Post Glasgow Era and China's Choices
The effective way to address global climate issues in post Glasgow era is to establish a fair and reasonable global governance mechanism,stimulate global public awareness of responsibility,and work together to address increasingly severe climate and environmental crisis.Therefore,it is necessary to resort to fundamental climate justice theory construction and practical guidance.The rightful state of climate justice is based on the theory of legal philosophy.It is the global justice theory that incorporates Rawls'theory of justice,Nagel's Hobbesian theory,and cosmopolitan theory,introduces the thinking of historical materialism and functionalism,and integrates the new development of international Pareto theory that enriches the connotation and extension of climate justice.Faced with the real dilemma of global climate justice practice,China faces both challenges and opportunities,and is committed to establishing a responsible image as a major country.The country should adhere to the moral stance of the"two communities"ideology,with the aim of striving for discourse power in climate negotiations,and adhere to the dual track approach of treating two types of countries differently,contributing Chinese wisdom and solutions to solve the practical dilemma of climate justice
climate justiceParis Agreementpost Glasgow eraecological integritycommon but differentiated responsibilities
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
