首页|个人信息刑事调取的适用限度与法律规制

个人信息刑事调取的适用限度与法律规制

扫码查看
数字时代,侦查机关依托数字信息技术增强数据收集处理能力,提升案件侦破效能.但是,侦查机关泛用刑事调取措施向网络信息企业调取公民个人信息,存在损害公民隐私权、个人信息权且过度干预企业合法经营的风险.在侦查机关适用信息调取措施的过程中,应当遵循限度理念,即以程序法定原则与比例原则归正侦查机关信息调取的必要限度,以公民个人信息权利与网络信息企业合法权益为信息刑事调取划定适用边界.强化侦查机关个人信息调取措施的法律规制具体从以下方面进行:其一,完善个人信息刑事调取的程序规范机制,按照任意性侦查措施与强制性侦查措施两种属性分别进行法律授权与程序规制,对现有刑事诉讼规范内容予以"信息化"调适,强化对侦查权的法律控制.其二,构建刑事诉讼中公民个人信息保护机制,保障信息主体通过行使信息知情权、信息访问权、信息更正删除权等权利直接、积极地进行个人信息保护.其三,优化企业配合刑事执法的权益保护机制,细化企业协助刑事执法义务,建立企业义务豁免机制,调和执法协助义务与数据合规义务的冲突;赋予作为第三方信息控制者的企业必要的权利,使企业能够以积极方式维护自身的合法权益.
The Applicable Limitation and Legal Regulation of Criminal Retrieval to Personal Information
In the digital age,investigative agencies rely on digital information technology to enhance data collection and processing capabilities and improve case detection efficiency.However,while investigative agencies enjoy the benefits of information retrieval measures to improve case handling efficiency,they also induce the hidden dangers of improper application of information retrieval measures to infringe on the rights of information subjects and the rights of information processors.At present,in criminal procedure legal norms,the content of information retrieval measures presents an authorization color,the overall normative density is low,and there is no strict procedural con-trol over the investigative agencies'rights to retrivel information.Driven by convenient rules and technologies,in-vestigative agencies obtain a wide range of citizen information controlled by third parties,especially Internet compa-nies,in the name of retrieval,which hides the risks of investigative agencies abusing their rights to obtain informa-tion and improperly restricting citizens'personal information rights and the rights and interests of Internet informa-tion companies.In the process of investigative agencies applying information retrieval measures,they should follow the concept of limits.Specifically,there are three limits.The first is to clarify the operating limits of investigative power,that is,to restrict the operation of investigative power based on the principles of statutory procedures and proportionality,and to restore the necessary limits of information retrieval by investigative agencies.The second is to play the restrictive role of citizens'rights,that is,to set limits on the information retrieval behavior of investigative agencies based on citizens'rights,and not to excessively interfere with citizens'privacy rights and personal infor-mation rights.The third is to play the restrictive role of the legitimate rights and interests of information processors,that is,to set limits on the information retrieval behavior of investigative agencies based on the rights and interests of network information companies,and not to impose excessive cooperation obligations on companies.Strengthening the legal regulation of the investigative agencies'personal information retrieval measures is carried out in the follow-ing aspects:First,improve the procedural normative mechanism for criminal retrieval to personal information,and carry out legal authorization and procedural regulation according to the two attributes of arbitrary investigative meas-ures and mandatory investigative measures,and make"informatization"adjustments to the existing criminal proce-dure norms to strengthen the legal control of the investigative power.Second,establish a mechanism for protecting citizens'personal information in criminal proceedings,recognize the basic right of personal information at the insti-tutional level,and use privacy rights and personal information rights as the basis for personal information protection.That is,on the basis of the existing privacy system,introduce personal information rights to ensure that information subjects can directly and actively protect their personal information by exercising the right to know information,the right to access information,the right to correct and delete information,and other rights,as well as make up for the shortcomings of the passive defense of privacy rights.Third,optimize the right protection mechanism for enterprises to cooperate with criminal law enforcement,refine the obligations of enterprises to assist in criminal law enforce-ment,establish an exemption mechanism for enterprises,and reconcile the conflict between the obligation to assist in law enforcement and the obligation to comply with data regulations;grant enterprises as third-party information controllers the necessary rights so that they can safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in an active manner.

criminal retrievalpersonal information rightsprivacy rightsmandatory measureslegal regulation

钱程

展开 >

大连海事大学 法学院,辽宁 大连 116026

刑事调取 个人信息权 隐私权 强制性措施 法律规制

中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2024)

3132024317

2024

中国海商法研究
中国海商法协会 大连海事大学

中国海商法研究

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.391
ISSN:1003-7659
年,卷(期):2024.35(2)
  • 23