System Inspection and Pattern Construction of Digital Justice
Originating from the need for legal implementation and dispute resolution,the judiciary has played a piv-otal role in the national political and legal system since its inception due to its unique functional positioning and in-stitutional connotation.It can be seen as a continuation and inevitable requirement of legislative work,as well as one of the core components of the national governance system.Especially in the current stage,the construction,ad-justment,and reform of the judiciary are showing irreplaceable practical value.At the same time,as the interface between law and society,as well as the intersection of the concept of rule of law and social needs,the operation,construction,and evaluation of the judiciary have always been difficult to abandon its attention to the social environ-ment and its development trends.It may even evolve based on its response to external realities,and in turn promote the maintenance and development of internal benefits.With the formulation of the 14th Five-Year Plan as a symbol,the pursuit of digital development goals and the construction of a digital China have become necessary for China to keep up with the wave of information revolution,grasp the trend of the times,and enhance its competitive advanta-ges.The construction of a digital society,the improvement of the level of digital government,and the creation of a digital ecosystem are also desirable directions for the future.In view of this,the promotion and construction of digit-al justice may also be an ideal direction to conform to the trend of the times and reform the judicial paradigm.The emergence of many studies has confirmed the value and effectiveness of such judicial models.However,the emer-gence and construction of digital justice still face severe challenges.Only in the process of integration of justice and technology,there have been smart justice,Internet justice and other models.The confusion of doubts about digital justice's influence,force and reform effect,and even the move to attribute digital justice to the informatization con-struction of the judicial administration system,will cause considerable obstacles to the confirmation of the practical significance of digital justice and the clarification of its connotation.It should be noted that the establishment of dig-ital justice stems from the doubts and debates about intelligent justice and Internet justice,and also focuses on the response to the future reform of the new judicial models and the judicial needs of the information age,with the fill-ing of existing gaps and the embodiment of the era attribute as the starting point and foothold.To sum up,digital justice should not only fully absorb the beneficial experience of smart justice and Internet justice in the application of emerging technologies and the trial of professional cases,but also focus on reducing the excessive emphasis on technical or professional features and the possible negative effects,and finally shape the coexistence pattern of"digital transformation of justice"and"judicial regulation of digit"in the two-way promotion and deep integration of digit and justice.The basic form of digital justice can also be revealed based on this.In contrast,one-dimension-al approaches such as"using technology to transform the judiciary"or"relying on judicial restrictions on technolo-gy"cannot fully express digital justice.Therefore,the construction of the Chinese model of digital justice and the clarification of the core content of digital justice should be explored with the joint assistance of criticism,absorp-tion,and transformation of traditional models,as well as digital innovation,in order to determine the actual form of digital justice.
digital justicesmart justiceInternet justicedigital transformationjudicial governance
万方数据
维普
