中国呼吸与危重监护杂志2025,Vol.24Issue(1) :9-17.DOI:10.7507/1671-6205.202404077

膈神经电刺激对ICU机械通气患者拔管结局影响的Meta分析

Effect of phrenic nerve electrical stimulation on extubation outcomes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients:a meta-analysis

郝恬 程洁 李琦 张志刚
中国呼吸与危重监护杂志2025,Vol.24Issue(1) :9-17.DOI:10.7507/1671-6205.202404077

膈神经电刺激对ICU机械通气患者拔管结局影响的Meta分析

Effect of phrenic nerve electrical stimulation on extubation outcomes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients:a meta-analysis

郝恬 1程洁 2李琦 3张志刚1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学护理学院(甘肃兰州 730030);兰州大学第一医院重症医学科(甘肃兰州 730000)
  • 2. 长治市人民医院护理部(山西长治 046000)
  • 3. 兰州大学第一医院神经内科(甘肃兰州 730000)
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 采用Meta分析的方法评价膈神经电刺激(phrenic nerve electrical stimulation,PNES)对重症监护病房(intensive care unit,ICU)机械通气患者拔管结局的影响.方法 应用计算机检索Cochrane图书馆数据库、美国国立医学图书馆PubMed数据库、科学网(Web of Science)、荷兰医学文摘Embase数据库和中国知网,从建库至2023年12月公开发表的有关ICU机械通气患者进行PNES效果的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT).对照组实施常规康复措施,观察组在常规康复措施基础上进行PNES.由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan5.4软件进行Meta分析.结果 最终纳入9篇RCT,文献质量评价结果显示1项研究为A级,8项研究为B级,纳入文献质量相对较高.Meta分析结果显示,与对照组比较,PNES能够提高脱机成功率[相对危险度(relative risk,RR)=1.33,95%CI(1.09,1.62),P=0.006],最大吸气压(maximal inspiratory pressure,MIP)[均数差(mean difference,MD)=1.36,95%CI(0.46,2.27),P=0.003]及膈肌增厚率(diaphragmatic thickness fraction,DTF)[MD=7.11,95%CI(0.53,13.69),P=0.03],有效缩短 ICU 患者机械通气时长[MD=-2.23,95%CI(-3.07,-1.38),P<0.000 01],降低重新上机率[RR=0.35,95%CI(0.15,0.85),P=0.02]及浅快呼吸指数(rapid shallow breathing index,RSBI)[MD=-11.57,95%CI(-18.51,-4.62),P=0.001],并缩短ICU住院时间[MD=-4.03,95%CI(-5.95,-2.11),P<0.000 1],差异均有统计学意义结论 PNES能有效缩短ICU机械通气患者的机械通气时间及ICU住院时间,降低重新上机率与RSBI,提高成功脱机率、MIP以及DTF.未来仍需开展高质量、大样本、多中心的RCT对研究结果加以论证.

Abstract

Objective To assess the effectiveness of phrenic nerve electrical stimulation(PNES)on extubation outcomes in intensive care unit(ICU)patients undergoing mechanical ventilation using a meta-analysis approach.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on the Cochrane Library,PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)published from database inception to December 2023,evaluating the effect of PNES on extubation outcomes in ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation.The control group received standard rehabilitation measures,while the intervention group received PNES in addition to standard rehabilitation.Two reviewers independently screened the literature,extracted data,and assessed the risk of bias.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software.Results Nine RCTs were included in the final analysis.The quality assessment indicated that one study was rated as Grade A and eight as Grade B,reflecting relatively high study quality.Meta-analysis results demonstrated that PNES significantly improved extubation success rates[relative risk(RR)=1.33,95%CI 1.09-1.62,P=0.006],maximal inspiratory pressure(MIP)[mean difference(MD)=1.36,95%CI 0.46-2.27,P=0.003],and diaphragmatic thickness fraction(DTF)(MD=7.11,95%CI0.53-13.69,P=0.03)compared with the control group.PNES also significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation(MD=-2.23,95%CI-3.07--1.38,P<0.000 01),re-intubation rates(RR=0.35,95%CI 0.15-0.85,P=0.02),and rapid shallow breathing index(RSBI)(MD=-11.57,95%CI-18.51--4.62,P=0.001).Additionally,PNES shortened ICU length of stay(MD=-4.03,95%CI-5.95--2.11,P<0.000 1),with all differences being statistically significant.Conclusion PNES effectively reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay,decreases re-intubation rates and RSBI,and improves extubation success,MIP,and DTF in ICU patients.Future high-quality,large-scale,multi-center RCTs are needed to further validate these findings.

关键词

膈神经电刺激/重症监护病房/机械通气/呼吸机相关膈肌功能障碍/Meta分析

Key words

Phrenic nerve electrical stimulation/intensive care unit/mechanical ventilation/ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction/meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2025
中国呼吸与危重监护杂志
四川大学华西医学中心,四川大学华西医院

中国呼吸与危重监护杂志

CSCD
影响因子:1.306
ISSN:1671-6205
段落导航相关论文