首页|《刑法》但书出罪条款的激活:体系定位与规范适用

《刑法》但书出罪条款的激活:体系定位与规范适用

扫码查看
在轻罪治理背景下,我国刑法结构正由"厉而不严"向"严而不厉"方向转型,轻微犯罪行为面临如何出罪的法治难题.但书条款作为我国刑法出罪的总括性依据,其实务运作存在适用率低、适用不当等多重问题.鉴于此,有必要探究其出罪模式,激活该条款之适用.当前,关于但书条款的体系定位,学界存在出罪标准说、入罪限制标准说、原则性指引说及可罚的违法性说之争.出罪标准说动摇我国刑法罪刑法定原则的根基,有悖我国刑法"立法定性+立法定量"的犯罪设定模式,并容易引发"同案不同判""裁量权滥用"的司法风险;入罪限制标准说存在重复评价犯罪构成实质违法性的逻辑缺陷;原则性指引说难以回应当下诸多轻微犯罪行为出罪的实践需求.可罚的违法性说内部存在阻却构成要件该当性说、阻却违法性说及二元说三种学说,但书条款的体系定位宜借鉴二元说.若罪名的分则条款含定量因素,则阻却构成要件该当性;若罪名的分则条款不含定量因素,则阻却违法性.但书条款"情节显著轻微"表征僭越社会相当性的程度,"危害不大"表征法益侵害程度,只要满足其一,即可阻却犯罪成立.
The Activation of the Saving Clause in Criminal Law:System Positioning and Norms Application
Against the background of misdemeanor management,the criminal law structure of our country is shifting from"severe but not strict"to"strict but not severe",and minor illegal behaviors face the legal problem of decriminalization.However,as the general basis of crime in Chinese criminal law,there are multiple practical difficulties such as low application rate and improper application.In view of this,it is necessary to explore its crime mode and activate the application of this clause.At present,there are debates in the academic circles about the system orientation of the standard of de-criminalization,the criterion of crimes,the principle of guidance and the theory of punishable illegali-ty.It is contrary to the crime setting mode of"legislative qualitative+legislative quantitative"in our criminal law,and easily leads to the judicial risk of"different sentences in the same case"and"abuse of discretionary power".There are logical defects in the theory of limitation standard of crime which repeatedly appraise the substantial illegality of crimes.The principle of guidance is also difficult to re-spond to the practical needs of many minor offenses.There are three theories in the system positio-ning of the theory of punishable illegality:the theory of preventing but constituting elements of pro-priety,the theory of preventing but constituting elements of illegality and the theory of dualism.If the specific provisions of the offence contain quantitative factors,it will prevent but constitute ele-ments of propriety;if the specific provisions of the offence do not contain quantitative factors,it will prevent illegality.However,the saving clause of"significantly minor circumstances"represents the degree of overstepping social equivalence,and"little harm"represents the degree of infringement of legal interests.As long as either is satisfied,the crime can be prevented.

saving clausedecriminalization mechanismsystem positioningpunishable illegality

陈俊秀、余惠芳

展开 >

福州大学 法学院,福建 福州 350108

但书 出罪机制 体系定位 可罚的违法性

2025

中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)
中国海洋大学

中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.621
ISSN:1672-335X
年,卷(期):2025.(1)