首页|环泊酚在重度抑郁症患者无抽搐电休克治疗中的效果观察

环泊酚在重度抑郁症患者无抽搐电休克治疗中的效果观察

Clinical efficacy of ciprofol in modified electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients

扫码查看
目的 观察环泊酚在重度抑郁症患者无抽搐电休克(MECT)治疗中的临床应用效果.方法 选择山西医科大学第一医院精神科2022年11月至2023年3月应用MECT治疗的重度抑郁症患者60例,年龄范围18~60岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级的患者60例,男31例,女29例,身体质量指数(BMI)为18~30 kg/m2,病程3个月至5年.该研究为前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法分为观察组(环泊酚+琥珀酰胆碱麻醉)和对照组(丙泊酚+琥珀酰胆碱麻醉).比较两组入室麻醉前(T0)、麻醉后(T1)、电抽搐即刻(T2)、电抽搐结束后(T3)的生命体征,包括心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)等.记录两组的呼吸恢复时间(静脉注射完琥珀酰胆碱至自主呼吸开始恢复的时间)和意识恢复时间(静注完环泊酚/丙泊酚至意识开始恢复的时间)、麻醉药物追加情况、血管活性药物应用情况、不良反应发生情况.结果 与T0相比,两组T1时MAP均降低,T2、T3时MAP均升高,T1、T2、T3与T0时相比MAP的差异均有统计学意义[观察组T0:(84.11±8.69)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),T1:(78.18±8.39)mmHg,T2:(99.28±12.42)mmHg,T3:(87.31±8.66)mmHg;对照组 T0:(86.33±10.99)mmHg,T1:(75.93±9.51)mmHg,T2:(100±13.3)mmHg,T3:(93.47±12.27)mmHg,均P<0.05].HR值组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).观察组T0到T1时的MAP波动小于对照组同时段的波动,而T2到T3波动差对照组小于观察组.观察组的意识恢复时间显著短于对照组[观察组:(8.76±0.59)min,对照组:(9.4±0.64)min;t=-4.07,P<0.05).观察组注射痛发生率明显低于对照组[观察组:0,对照组:30.00%(9/30)](x2=8.36,P<0.05),两组患者的呼吸恢复时间、头痛、低血压、分泌物增多、术后恶心呕吐及血管活性药物使用等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 环泊酚用于MECT治疗时可达到良好的麻醉效果,同时患者血流动力学更加平稳,注射痛轻微,苏醒较丙泊酚更快.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of ciprofol in modified electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients.Methods A total of 60 patients with major depressive disorder who received modified electroconvulsive therapy at the Department of Psychiatry,First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,from November 2022 to March 2023 were included in this study.They were aged 18-60 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grades Ⅰ-Ⅱ.The patient cohort consisted of 31 males and 29 females,with a body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2.The disease duration varied from 3 months to 5 years.This study was designed as a prospective study.All included patients were assigned to observation(ciprofol+succinylcholine)and control(propofol+succinylcholine)using the digital number table method.Vital signs,including heart rate,mean arterial pressure,and blood oxygen saturation,were compared between the two groups at four time points:before anesthesia(T0),after anesthesia(T1),immediately after electroconvulsive therapy(T2),and after the completion of electroconvulsive therapy(T3).The time to recover spontaneous breathing(from intravenous injection of succinylcholine to the onset of spontaneous breathing),the time to recover consciousness(from intravenous injection of ciprofol/propofol to the onset of consciousness),the need for additional anesthetic drugs,the use of vasoactive medications,and the occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded in each group.Results Compared with T0,both groups exhibited a decrease in mean arterial pressure at T1 and an increase at T2 and T3.The differences in mean arterial pressure between T1,T2,T3,and T0 were statistically significant[observation group:T0:(84.11±8.69)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),T1:(78.18±8.39)mmHg,T2:(99.28±12.42)mmHg,T3:(87.31±8.66)mmHg;control group:T0:(86.33±10.99)mmHg,T1:(75.93±9.51)mmHg,T2:(100±13.3)mmHg,T3:(93.47±12.27)mmHg,all P<0.05].There was no statistically significant difference in heart rate at different time points between the two groups(all P>0.05).The change in mean arterial pressure from T0 to T1 in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group during the same period.The change in mean arterial pressure from T2 to T3 in the control group was smaller compared with that in the observation group.The time to recover consciousness in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group[observation group:(8.76±0.59)minutes,control group:(9.4±0.64)minutes,t=-4.07,P<0.05].The incidence of injection pain in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group[observation group:0,control group:30.00%(9/30),x2=8.36,P<0.05].There were no statistically significant differences in time to recover spontaneous breathing,the number(percentage)of patients experiencing headaches,hypotension,increased secretions,or postoperative nausea and vomiting,or the number(percentage)of patients using vasoactive drugs between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion When used in modified electroconvulsive therapy,ciprofol can provide excellent anesthetic effects.It results in more stable hemodynamics in patients,causes milder injection pain,and leads to a faster recovery compared with propofol.

Depressive disorderElectroshockHeart rateArterial pressureOximetryCiprofol

孔鹏杰、吕洁萍

展开 >

山西中医药大学附属医院麻醉科,太原 030024

山西医科大学第一附属医院麻醉科,太原 030001

抑郁症 电休克 心率 动脉压 血氧测定法 环泊酚

2024

中国基层医药
中华医学会,安徽医科大学

中国基层医药

影响因子:1.003
ISSN:1008-6706
年,卷(期):2024.31(8)
  • 4