首页|神经肌电图检测在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的应用价值

神经肌电图检测在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的应用价值

Value of neuroelectromyography in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

扫码查看
目的 观察神经肌电图检测中神经传导检测(NCV)联合F波、H反射及皮肤交感反应(SSR)检测对糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的诊断价值.方法 选取2022年10月至2023年10月山西省汾阳医院(山西医科大学附属汾阳医院)收治的糖尿病周围神经病患者212例为研究对象,根据有无周围神经病变症状分为无症状组(100例)、有症状组(112例);选择同期在该院体检的健康人100例为对照组,均对正中神经、尺神经、胫神经、腓总神经等行运动神经传导检测(MNCV),对正中神经、尺神经、腓浅神经、腓肠神经等行感觉神经传导检测(SNCV),同时检测正中神经和胫神经行F波,检测胫神经H反射及皮肤交感反应.分析比较不同组间MNCV、SNCV、F波、H反射和SSR等差异.结果 DPN患者无症状组、有症状组与对照组比较[运动传导速度减慢(F=390.32、264.63、228.58、714.30),末端潜伏期延长(F=316.87、106.88、108.58、217.86),CMAP 波幅下降(F=113.38、59.58、14.92、10.36),感觉传导速度减慢(F=568.87、532.74、973.75、1181.27),SNAP波幅下降(F=229.53、309.97、251.07、414.82),F 波(F=653.96、538.20)、H 波潜伏期较正常延长(F=401.54),SSR 潜伏期延长(F=147.93、98.85)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).同时有症状组与无症状组比较,胫神经、腓总神经的MNCV(t=7.33、13.31)、DML(t=13.56、4.34)、CMAP(t=2.98、2.99)等差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05);正中神经、尺神经、腓肠神经、腓浅神经的 SNCV(t=12.85、13.70、11.08、15.66)、SNAP(t=20.15、20.26、8.96、18.55)差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);正中神经、胫神经F波差异均有统计学意义(t=31.96、13.70,均P<0.05).DPN患者无症状组单纯NCV检测的异常率为86%(86/100),NCV、F波、H反射联合SSR检测异常率为91%(91/100),DPN患者有症状组单纯NCV检测的异常率为90.18%(101/112),NCV、F波、H反射联合SSR检测异常率为98.21%(110/112),联合检测异常率有症状组高于无症状组,差异有统计学意义(x2=5.58,P=0.018).结论 神经肌电图检查对DPN的诊断价值较高;对早期无周围神经症状时采用F波、F反射、SSR联合NCV检测,可提高DPN的早期诊断.
Objective To investigate the value of nerve conduction velocity testing combined with F-waves,H-reflexes,and sympathetic skin responses in electroneuromyography in the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods A total of 212 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who received treatment at Fenyang Hospital of Shanxi Province(Fenyang Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University)from October 2022 to October 2023 were included in this study.These patients were divided into an asymptomatic group(n=100)and a symptomatic group(n=112)based on the presence or absence of peripheral neuropathy symptoms.Additionally,100 healthy individuals who underwent physical examinations at the same hospital during this period were included in the control group.Motor nerve conduction velocities were measured for the median nerve,ulnar nerve,tibial nerve,and common peroneal nerve,while sensory nerve conduction velocities were assessed for the median nerve,ulnar nerve,superficial peroneal nerve,and gastrocnemius nerve.F-waves were recorded for the median and tibial nerves.The H-reflexes of the tibial nerve and sympathetic skin response were also evaluated.Differences in motor nerve conduction velocity,sensory nerve conduction velocity,F-waves,H-reflexes,and sympathetic skin responses among the different groups were compared.Results In the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups,motor conduction velocities were lower(F=390.32,264.63,228.58,714.30),distal motor latencies were longer(F=316.87,106.88,108.58,217.86),compound muscle action potential amplitudes were lower(F=113.38,59.58,14.92,10.36),sensory conduction velocities were slower(F=568.87,532.74,973.75,1181.27),sensory nerve action potential amplitudes were lower(F=229.53,309.97,251.07,414.82),F-waves were longer(F=653.96,538.20),H-wave latencies were longer(F=401.54),and sympathetic skin response latencies were also longer(F=147.93,98.85)compared with those in the control group(all P<0.05).There were significant differences in motor nerve conduction velocity(t=7.33,13.31),distal motor latency(t=13.56,4.34),compound muscle action potential amplitude(t=2.98,2.99)of the tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups(all P<0.05).Significant differences were also observed in the sensory nerve conduction velocity(t=12.85,13.70,11.08,15.66)and sensory nerve action potential amplitude(t=20.15,20.26,8.96,18.55)of the median nerve,ulnar nerve,gastrocnemius nerve,and superficial peroneal nerve(all P<0.05).Additionally,differences in F-waves of the median and tibial nerves were significant(t=31.96,13.70,both P<0.05).The abnormal detection rate of nerve conduction velocity test in the asymptomatic group was 86%(86/100),while the abnormal detection rate of combined nerve conduction velocity test,F-waves,H-reflexes,and sympathetic skin response was 91%(91/100).In the symptomatic group,the abnormal detection rate of nerve conduction velocity test alone was 90.18%(101/112),and the abnormal detection rate of combined nerve conduction velocity test,F-waves,H-reflexes,and sympathetic skin responses was 98.21%(110/112).The abnormal detection rate of combined therapy in the symptomatic group was significantly higher than that in the asymptomatic group(x2=5.58,P=0.018).Conclusion Neuroelectromyography has high diagnostic value for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.The use of F-waves,H-reflexes,and sympathetic skin responses,in conjunction with nerve conduction velocity testing,can enhance the early diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in patients who do not exhibit peripheral neuropathy symptoms.

Diabetic neuropathiesNeural conductionMedian nerveUlnar nerveSural nerveTibial nerveElectromyography

王淑慧、田瑶

展开 >

山西省汾阳医院山西医科大学附属汾阳医院神经内科,汾阳 032200

山西省汾阳医院山西医科大学附属汾阳医院内分泌科,汾阳 032200

糖尿病神经病变 神经传导 正中神经 尺神经 腓肠神经 胫神经 肌电描记术

山西省汾阳医院科技攻关计划

202312

2024

中国基层医药
中华医学会,安徽医科大学

中国基层医药

影响因子:1.003
ISSN:1008-6706
年,卷(期):2024.31(8)
  • 15