首页|多模态影像学技术在宫颈癌分期及病理分化程度评估中的应用

多模态影像学技术在宫颈癌分期及病理分化程度评估中的应用

扫码查看
目的 分析多模态影像学检查技术在宫颈癌(CC)临床分期及病理分化程度评估中的应用价值.方法 采用横断面研究,选取咸阳市中心医院2022年2月至2023年9月确诊的CC患者83例的临床资料进行回顾性分析.患者均行盆腔磁共振平扫、磁共振扩散加权成像(MRI-DWI)与磁共振动态增强(DCE-MRI)技术扫描,运用双盲法比较不同临床分期及不同组织学分级患者DWI参数[表观扩散系数(ADC)、慢扩散系数(D)、快扩散系数(D*)]和DCE参数[容积转运常数(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)、容积分数(Ve)]间的不同,评价多模态MRI在宫颈癌分期及病理分化中的应用价值.结果 Ⅰb期及以下患者ADC值明显高于Ⅱa、Ⅱb及Ⅲ期以上患者(F=7.90,P<0.01),Ktrans、Kep、Ve值均低于Ⅱa、Ⅱb及Ⅲ期以上患者(F=8.12、7.64、3.13,均P<0.01);Ⅱa期患者ADC值为(0.84±0.15),高于Ⅲ期以上患者的(0.76±0.07)(t=1.88,P=0.035),Ktrans、Kep、D.值分别为(0.29±0.09)、(0.53±0.13)、(39.08±7.30),均低于 Ⅲ 期以上患者的(0.39±0.12)、(0.69±0.18)、(49.04±6.72)](t=-2.64、-2.85、-3.94,均P<0.01).G1级患者ADC值高于G2、G3级患者(F=4.26,P<0.05),Ktrans、Kep、D*值均低于G2、G3级患者(F=8.14、6.83、6.81,均P<0.05).Pearson相关性分析结果显示,CC患者组织学分级与ADC值呈负相关(r=-0.32,P=0.003),与 Ktrans、Kep、D*值呈正相关(r=0.43、0.35、0.28,均P<0.05).结论 多模态影像学技术在评估CC临床分期及病理分化程度中具有很好的应用价值,值得临床借鉴和应用.
Application of multimodal imaging technology in the staging of cervical cancer and evaluation of pathological differentiation
Objective To analyze the application value of multimodal imaging technology in the staging of cervical cancer and evaluation of pathological differentiation.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 83 patients with cervical cancer who received treatment at Xian Yang Central Hospital from February 2022 to September 2023.All patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),including diffusion-weighted imaging(MRI-DWI)and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI).A double-blind method was used to compare the DWI parameters[apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC),slow diffusion coefficient(D),and fast diffusion coefficient(D*)]and DCE parameters[volume transfer constant(Ktrans),rate constant(Kep),and extracellular volume fraction(Ve)]among patients with different clinical stages and histological grades.The application value of multimodal MRI in the staging of cervical cancer and evaluation of pathological differentiation was analyzed.Results The ADC values in patients with cervical cancer at stage Ⅰ b and below were significantly higher than those in patients with cervical cancer at stages Ⅱa,Ⅱ b,and Ⅲ and above(F=7.90,P<0.01).Conversely,the Ktrans,Kep,and Ve values were all lower in patients with cervical cancer at stage Ⅰ b and below than those in patients with cervical cancer at stages Ⅱa,Ⅱ b,and Ⅲ and above(F=8.12,7.64,3.13,all P<0.01).For patients with cervical cancer at stage Ⅱ a,the ADC value was(0.84±0.15),which was higher than that of patients with cervical cancer at stage Ⅲ and above(0.76±0.07)(t=1.88,P=0.035).The Ktrans,Kep,and D*values were(0.29±0.09),(0.53±0.13),and(39.08±7.30),respectively,all of which were lower than those in patients with cervical cancer at stage Ⅲ and above[(0.39±0.12),(0.69±0.18),(49.04±6.72),t=-2.64,-2.85,-3.94,all P<0.01].The ADC values in G1 grade patients were higher than those in G2 and G3 grade patients(F=4.26,P<0.05),while the Ktrans,Kep,and D*values were all lower than those in G2 and G3 grade patients(F=8.14,6.83,6.81,all P<0.05).Pearson correlation analysis showed that the histological grade of patients with cervical cancer was negatively correlated with the ADC value(r=-0.32,P=0.003)and positively correlated with the Ktrans,Kep,and D*values(r=0.43,0.35,0.28,all P<0.05).Conclusion Multimodal imaging technology has good application value in evaluating the clinical staging and pathological differentiation of cervical cancer,making them worthy of clinical reference and application.

Uterine cervical neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm stagingNeoplasm grading

焦振华、秦琛琛

展开 >

咸阳市中心医院影像中心,咸阳 712000

宫颈肿瘤 磁共振成像 弥散磁共振成像 肿瘤分期 肿瘤分级

2024

中国基层医药
中华医学会,安徽医科大学

中国基层医药

影响因子:1.003
ISSN:1008-6706
年,卷(期):2024.31(12)