首页|集中带量采购与进口头孢呋辛钠在妇产科围手术期预防用药中的经济学评价

集中带量采购与进口头孢呋辛钠在妇产科围手术期预防用药中的经济学评价

扫码查看
目的 评价集中带量采购(集采)和进口注射用头孢呋辛钠在妇产科围手术期预防用药中的药物经济学.方法 采用回顾性队列研究,纳入2021年1-12月嘉兴市妇幼保健院收治的妇产科患者408例为研究对象,并根据围手术期抗菌药物分为进口组和集采组.再通过倾向性评分匹配法(PSM)平衡混杂因素,比较术后临床感染指标、最高体温、住院时间、术后感染情况以及进行成本-效果分析(CEA).结果 PSM后共有132组患者匹配成功.集采组住院时间[(6.12±0.28)d]、术后第一次白细胞计数[(8.40±0.56)×109/L]、术后最高体温[(37.16±0.04)℃]、总预防有效率[93.9%(124/132)]分别与进口组的(6.21±0.16)d、(7.83±0.44)×109/L、(37.16±0.03)℃、95.5%(126/132)比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.28、0.80、0.02,x2=0.30,均P>0.05).集采组抗菌药物费用[50.70(33.80,67.60)]元和西药总费用[(831.41±39.13)元]分别低于进口组的[70.48(35.24,105.72)]元、(975.98±46.35)元(Z=-7,70,t=-2.38,均P<0.05).比较两种费用的成本/效果比,集采组(0.54、8.85),分别低于进口组的0.74、10.22.以集采组为基准,每增加1%的预防有效率,进口组需要的增量抗菌药物费用和增量西药总费用分别为12.36元和90.36元.结论 集采和进口注射用头孢呋辛预防妇产科术后感染的效果确切;集采头孢呋辛的成本-效果比优于进口产品,更具经济学优势.
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of cefuroxime sodium acquired through centralized bulk purchasing versus importation for perioperative prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology
Objective To assess the pharmacoeconomic implications of injectable cefuroxime sodium acquired through centralized bulk purchasing versus importation for perioperative prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 408 patients treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from January to December 2021.The patients were divided into two groups based on the type of perioperative antimicrobial agents used:the importation group and the centralized bulk purchasing group.Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding factors.Postoperative clinical infection indicators,maximum body temperature,length of hospital stay,and incidence of postoperative infections were compared between the two groups.Additionally,a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed.Results After propensity score matching,a total of 132 patients were successfully matched.In the centralized bulk purchasing group,the length of hospital stay,first postoperative white blood cell count,maximum body temperature,and overall prophylactic effectiveness rate were(6.12±0.28)days,(8.40±0.56)× 109/L,(37.16±0.04)° C,and 93.9%(124/132),respectively.In comparison,the corresponding values in the importation group were(6.21±0.16)days,(7.83±0.44)× 109/L,(37.16±0.03)℃,and 95.5%(126/132).The differences in these measurements between the two groups were not statistically significant(t=-0.28,0.80,0.02,x2=0.30,all P>0.05).In the centralized bulk purchasing group,the antimicrobial drug cost was 50.70(33.80,67.60)yuan,and the total cost of Western medicine was(831.41±39.13)yuan.Both of these costs were significantly lower than those in the importation group[70.48(35.24,105.72)yuan,(975.98±46.35)yuan,Z=-7.70,t=-2.38,both P<0.05].The cost-effectiveness ratio of the centralized bulk purchasing group and the importation group was 0.54 and 8.85,respectively,which were lower than those in the importation group(0.74,10.22).Using the prevention effectiveness of the centralized bulk purchasing group as a baseline,every 1%increase in prevention effectiveness in the importation group resulted in additional costs of 12.36 yuan for antimicrobial drugs and 90.36 yuan for total Western medicine.Conclusion Injectable cefuroxime sodium acquired through both centralized bulk purchasing and importation is highly effective in preventing postoperative infections in obstetrics and gynecology.A cost-effectiveness analysis shows that the injectable cefuroxime sodium obtained through centralized bulk purchasing is more cost-effective than the imported approach,resulting in greater economic benefits.

CefuroximeGroup purchasingCosts and cost analysisGynecologic surgical proceduresPerioperative periodAnti-bacterial agentsEconomics,pharmaceutical

张艳、张寅英、李晔

展开 >

嘉兴市妇幼保健院药剂科,嘉兴 314000

头孢呋辛 集体采购 成本及成本分析 妇科外科手术 围手术期 抗菌药 经济学,药学

2024

中国基层医药
中华医学会,安徽医科大学

中国基层医药

影响因子:1.003
ISSN:1008-6706
年,卷(期):2024.31(12)
  • 1