首页|固定急救反应团队联合急诊流程优化对急性心肌梗死患者溶栓时间、急救效果的影响

固定急救反应团队联合急诊流程优化对急性心肌梗死患者溶栓时间、急救效果的影响

Influence of fixed emergency response team combined with emergency process optimization on thrombolysis time and emergency effect in patients with acute myocardial infarction

扫码查看
目的 探讨固定急救反应团队联合急诊流程优化对急性心肌梗死患者溶栓时间、急救效果的影响.方法 将我院2023年6月—2024年3月收治的128例急性心肌梗死患者作为本次研究对象,按照不同急救模式将患者分为对照组(n=64,采取急诊流程优化措施)和研究组(n=64,在对照组的基础上联合固定急救反应团队救治).观察比较两组患者的急救指标(分诊评估时间、静脉开通时间、心电图检查时间、开始溶栓时间)、生命体征[心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)]、心功能指标[左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)]、急救效果、不良事件发生情况.结果 研究组患者分诊评估时间、静脉开通时间、心电图检查时间、开始溶栓时间均短于对照组患者(t=2.932、3.922、5.342、2.544,P<0.05);急救前,两组患者HR、RR、SBP、DBP、LVEDD、LVEF差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);急救后,两组患者HR、RR、SBP、DBP、LVEDD均低于急救前,且研究组比对照组更低,(t=3.440、4.728、3.754、6.551、3.811,P<0.05);急救后,LVEF均比急救前升高且研究组比对照组更高(t=5.880,P<0.05);研究组急救总有效率为 93.75%(60/64),高于对照组的 81.25%(52/64)(χ2=4.571,P<0.05);对照组的不良事件总发生率为23.44%(15/64),研究组的不良事件总发生率为 14.06%(9/64),两组患者不良事件总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 固定急救反应团队联合急诊流程优化能够缩短对AMI患者的急救时间,稳定患者生命体征,有效改善患者心功能,急救效果良好.
Objective To explore the influence of fixed emergency response team combined with emergency process optimization on thrombolysis time and emergency effect in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients with acute myocardial infarction in the hospital were selected from June 2023 to March 2024 as the study subjects,and were divided into control group(n=64,emergency process optimization measure)and study group(n=64,fixed emergency response team treatment on the basis of control group)according to different emergency model.The emergency indicators(triage evaluation time,venous patency time,electrocardiogram time,thrombolysis time),vital signs[heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP)],cardiac function indicators[left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD)],emergency effect and occurrence of adverse events were observed and compared between groups.Results The triage evaluation time,venous patency time,electrocardiogram examination time and thrombolysis time in study group were shorter than those in control group(t=2.932,3.922,5.342,2.544,P<0.05).Before emergency,HR,RR,SBP,DBP,LVEDD and LVEF were similar between both groups(P>0.05).After emergency,HR,RR,SBP,DBP and LVEDD in the two groups were lower than those before emergency,and the indicators in study group were lower than those in control group(t=3.440,4.728,3.754,6.551,3.811,P<0.05).After emergency,the lVEF was risen than that before emergency,and LVEF in study group was higher compared to control group(t=5.880,P<0.05).The total effective rate of emergency treatment in the study group was 93.75%(60/64),which was higher than 81.25%(52/64)in the control group(χ2=4.571,P<0.05).The total incidence rate of adverse events was 23.44%(15/64)in control group and 14.06%(9/64)in study group,and there was no statistical difference between groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Fixed emergency response team combined with emergency process optimization can shorten the emergency time of AMI patients,stabilize the vital signs,and effectively improve the cardiac function of patients,and it has a good emergency effect.

Fixed emergency response teamEmergency process optimizationAcute myocardial infarctionThrombolysis timeEmergency effect

席睿、杨晶

展开 >

空军军医大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科,陕西 西安 710032

固定急救反应团队 急诊流程优化 急性心肌梗死 溶栓时间 急救效果

2024

中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志
中国医学救援学会

中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.568
ISSN:1673-6966
年,卷(期):2024.19(12)