首页|共享决策模型指导下的链式急救护理方案在急性脑梗死患者抢救中的应用效果

共享决策模型指导下的链式急救护理方案在急性脑梗死患者抢救中的应用效果

Application effect of chain emergency nursing scheme under the guidance of shared decision model in the rescue of patients with acute cerebral infarction

扫码查看
目的 探讨共享决策模型指导下的链式急救护理方案在急性脑梗死患者抢救中的应用效果.方法 选取2021 年 1 月—2022 年 12 月于武汉市第四医院急诊科就诊的急性脑梗死患者 120 例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各 60 例.对照组采用常规急救护理,观察组在此基础上采用共享决策模型指导下的链式急救护理方案.比较两组患者的急救效率、抢救成功率、神经功能缺损程度、脑血管再通率、病死率、致残率和生活质量.结果 观察组患者急诊到达时间、诊断时间、治疗时间、抢救时间均短于对照组(t=3.519、6.217、6.375、6.314,P<0.05).观察组患者抢救成功率、脑血管再通率均高于对照组(P<0.05).观察组患者病死率、致残率均低于对照组(χ2=6.536、7.500,P<0.05).入院时,两组患者美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良Rankin量表(mRS)、Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)评分以及生理功能、角色功能、身体疼痛、总体健康、精神健康、社会功能、活力和情感功能评分比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=6.536、6.708,P>0.05).出院时,两组患者NIHSS、mRS评分均低于入院时,FMA评分高于入院时,且观察组患者NIHSS、mRS评分均低于对照组,FMA评分高于对照组(t=6.883、8.814、5.473,P<0.05);出院时,两组患者生理功能、角色功能、身体疼痛、总体健康、精神健康、社会功能、活力和情感功能评分均高于入院时,且观察组高于对照组(t=4.435、5.023、5.631、5.238、5.481、5.325、5.413、6.445,P<0.05).结论 共享决策模型指导下的链式急救护理方案能提高急性脑梗死患者的急救效率、抢救成功率和脑血管再通率,降低神经功能缺损程度、病死率和致残率,并提高生活质量,值得在临床推广应用.
Objective To explore the application effect of chain emergency nursing schemeunder the guidance of shared decision model in the rescue of patients with acute cerebral infarction.Methods One hundred and twenty patients with acute cerebral infarction who visited the emergency department of Wuhan Fourth Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method,60 cases in each group.The control group received routine emergency nursing,while the observation group received chain emergency nursing scheme under the guidance of shared decision model on this basis.The emergency efficiency,rescue success rate,neurological function deficit degree,cerebral vascular recanalization rate,mortality rate,disability rate and quality of life in the two groups were compared.Results The emergency arrival time,diagnosis time,treatment time and rescue time in observation group were shorter than those in control group(t=3.519,6.217,6.375,6.314,P<0.05).The rescue success rate and cerebral vascular recanalization rate of observation group were higher than those of control group(χ2=6.536,7.500,P<0.05).The mortality rate and disability rate of observation group were lower than those of control group(χ2=6.536,6.708,P<0.05).At admission,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on the scores of National Institutes of Health Stroke scale(NIHSS),modified Rankin Scale(mRS),Fugl-Meyer Assessment(FMA),physiological function,role function,physical pain,overall health,mental health,social function,vitality and emotional function(P>0.05).At discharge,the scores of NIHSS and mRS in two groups were lower than at admission,and FMA scores in two groups were higher than at admission,the scores of NIHSS and mRS in observation group were lower than those in control group,and FMA scores in observation group were higher than those in control group(t=6.883,8.814,5.473,P<0.05).At discharge,the scores of physiological function,role function,physical pain,overall health,mental health,social function,vitality and emotional function in two groups were higher than those at admission,and observation group was higher than control group(t=4.435,5.023,5.631,5.238,5.481,5.325,5.413,6.445,P<0.05).Conclusion The chain emergency nursing scheme under the guidance of shared decision model can improve the emergency efficiency,rescue success rate and cerebral vascular recanalization rate of acute cerebral infarction patients,reduce the neurological function deficit degree,mortality rate and disability rate,and improve quality of life.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Shared decision modelChain emergency nursing schemeAcute cerebral infarctionNeurological function

韩琼、夏成龙、罗志秀、周乔、黄莹、王雯、曹思思

展开 >

武汉市第四医院康复医学科,湖北 武汉 430030

武汉市第四医院急诊科,湖北 武汉 430030

武汉市第四医院神经内科,湖北 武汉 430030

武汉市第四医院全科医学科,湖北 武汉 430030

展开 >

共享决策模型 链式急救护理方案 急性脑梗死 神经功能

2024

中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志
中国医学救援学会

中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.568
ISSN:1673-6966
年,卷(期):2024.19(12)