Clinical efficacy of biofeedback and electrical stimulation on pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic uterine suspension
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of biofeedback and electrical stimulation on pelvic organ prolapse(POP)after laparoscopic uterine suspension.Methods A total of 102 cases of POP patients admitted to our hospital were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number table method,with 51 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with laparoscopic uterine suspension,and the patients in the observation group were treated with biofeedback and electrical stimulation on the basis of the control group.The total effective rate,pelvic floor distress inventory-20(PFDI-20)score,pelvic floor impact questionnaire-7(PFIQ-7)score,female sexual function index(FSFI)score,pelvic incontinence sexual questionnaire(PISQ)score,and recurrence rate of the patients in the two groups were compared.A neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy instrument was used to detect the recovery of pelvic floor muscle for patients before and after treatment.Results Compared with the control group,the efficacy of patients in the observation group was superior(P<0.05).The PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores after treatment of patients in the two groups were decreased compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores after treatment of patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The pelvic floor muscle strength,maximal muscle contraction force and sustained contraction time after treatment of patients in the two groups were significantly stronger/longer than those before treatment(P<0.05),and the pelvic floor muscle strength,maximal muscle contraction force and sustained contraction time after treatment of patients in the observation group were stronger/longer than those in the control group(P<0.05).The FSFI and PISQ scores after treatment of patients in the two groups were significantly increased compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),and the FSFI and PISQ scores after treatment in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).The recurrence rate after treatment of patients in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Biofeedback and electrical stimulation can enhance the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine suspension in the treatment of POP,improve the pelvic floor muscle strength and POP of patients,and improve their quality of life.
biofeedback and electrical stimulationlaparoscopyuterine suspensionpelvic organ prolapseclinical efficacy
万方数据
维普
