首页|单侧双通道内镜和经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的对比分析

单侧双通道内镜和经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的对比分析

扫码查看
目的 比较采用单侧双通道内镜(UBE)技术和经皮椎间孔镜(PELD)技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析我院149例腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为UBE组(n=80)和PELD组(n=69).比较2组患者手术时间、术中透视次数、术中出血量、住院时间、术后并发症、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、椎间盘高度和椎管面积.结果 UBE组患者手术时间长于PELD组,术中透视次数少于PELD组,差异均有显著统计学意义(P<0.001);2组患者术中出血量、住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组患者各个时间点的VAS、ODI评分组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).2组患者各个时间点的椎间盘高度和椎管面积组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术后椎管面积均大于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).UBE组患者术后并发症发生率低于PELD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 从短期疗效看,PELD技术和UBE技术均能有效缓解腰椎间盘突出症引起的腰腿痛症状,UBE技术手术时间较长,但术中透视次数较少,术后并发症发生率较低.
Comparative analysis of unilateral biportal endoscopy and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
Objective To compare the clinical efficacies of unilateral biportal endoscopy(UBE)technique and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PELD)technique in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods The clinical data of 149 patients with lumbar disc herniation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the UBE group(n=80)and the PELD group(n=69)according to different surgical methods.The operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,postoperative complications,visual analogue scale(VAS)score,Oswestry disability index(ODI)score,intervertebral disc height and vertebral canal area of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time in the UBE group was longer than that in the PELD group,and the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency was fewer than that in the PELD group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss or hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the VAS or ODI scores at each time point between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intervertebral disc height or vertebral canal area at each time point between the two groups(P>0.05).The postoperative vertebral canal areas of patients in the two groups were greater than those before surgery,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the UBE group was lower than that in the PELD group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In terms of short-term efficacy,both PELD technique and UBE technique can effectively relieve the symptoms of low back and leg pain caused by lumbar disc herniation,and the UBE technique has longer operation time,but with fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency,and lower incidence of postoperative complications.

unilateral biportal endoscopypercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomylumbar disc herniationminimally invasive surgery

赵予辉、薛滨勇、周立勇、李非、许士超、李晓航、王建新

展开 >

盘锦辽油宝石花医院骨外科,辽宁 盘锦 124010

单侧双通道内镜 经皮椎间孔镜 腰椎间盘突出症 微创手术

2024

局解手术学杂志
重庆市解剖学会,第三军医大学

局解手术学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.063
ISSN:1672-5042
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)
  • 2