首页|不同手术方式对老年腰椎结核患者的临床疗效分析

不同手术方式对老年腰椎结核患者的临床疗效分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同手术方式对老年腰椎结核患者的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2018年8月至2021年8月河北省胸科医院收治的289例老年腰椎结核患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将患者分为后路组(109例)、前后路联合组(81例)和前路组(99例).收集并比较3组患者植骨融合时间、手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量及并发症发生情况,定期测定患者脊柱Cobb角,并计算矫正度;比较3组患者红细胞沉降率(ESR)、白细胞计数(WBC)及C反应蛋白(CRP)的水平;比较3组患者的Frankel分级及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分.结果 术后随访2年,3组患者的植骨融合时间比较,差异无统计意义(P>0.05);前路组患者手术时间最短(P<0.05);后路组患者住院时间最短,术中出血量及并发症发生率最低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).前后路联合组患者矫正度优于后路组及前路组(P<0.05),后路组患者术后及末次随访Cobb角更优(P<0.05).前后路联合组患者末次随访CRP及ESR的改善效果更好(P<0.05),后路组患者的WBC水平更低(P<0.05).末次随访3组患者Frankel分级E级人数比例高于术后(P<0.05);与术前比较,3组患者末次随访VAS评分下降(P<0.05),后路组患者VAS评分更低(P<0.05).结论 前路手术、后路手术及前后路联合手术方式治疗老年腰椎结核的效果均较好,临床可依据患者身体情况科学合理制定入路方式,提升临床治疗效果.
Clinical efficacies of different surgical methods on elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis
Objective To explore the clinical efficacies of different surgical methods for elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis.Methods The clinical data of 289 elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis admitted to Hebei Chest Hospital from August 2018 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.According to surgical methods,the patients were divided into the posterior group(109 cases),the anterior and posterior combination group(81 cases),and the anterior group(99 cases).The time of bone graft and fusion,operation time,hospital stay,intraoperative blood loss,and complications of the three groups were collected and compared among the three groups.The spine Cobb angle was regularly determined,the correction degree was calculated;the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR),white blood cell count(WBC),and C-reactive protein(CRP)were collected and compared among the three groups;and the Frankel grading and visual analogue scale(VAS)scores of the three groups were compared.Results After a 2-year follow-up,there was no significant difference in the time of bone graft and fusion among the three groups(P>0.05),the anterior group had the shortest operation time,the posterior group had the shortest hospital stay,and the lowest intraoperative blood loss and incidence of complications,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The correction degree of the anterior and posterior combination group was better than that of the posterior group and the anterior group(P<0.05),and the Cobb angles after operation and at the last follow-up in the posterior group was better(P<0.05).The anterior and posterior combination group had better improvement effect on CRP and ESR at the last follow-up(P<0.05),the WBC level of the posterior group was lower(P<0.05).The proportions of patients in grade E of Frankel grading at the last follow-up in the three groups were higher than those after surgery(P<0.05);compared with the preoperative period,the VAS scores at the last follow-up of the three groups decreased(P<0.05),and the VAS score of the posterior group was lower(P<0.05).Conclusion The effects of anterior surgery,posterior surgery and anterior and posterior combined surgery in the treatment of elderly lumbar tuberculosis are good,and the approach method can be scientifically and reasonably formulated according to patients' physical condition to improve the clinical treatment effect.

anterior surgeryposterior surgeryelderlylumbar tuberculosisclinical efficacy

王帅、董昭良、刘树仁、贾晨光、王连波

展开 >

河北省胸科医院急诊外科,河北 石家庄 050041

河北省胸科医院骨科,河北 石家庄 050041

前路手术 后路手术 老年 腰椎结核 临床疗效

2019年度河北省医学科学研究课题计划

20191034

2024

局解手术学杂志
重庆市解剖学会,第三军医大学

局解手术学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.063
ISSN:1672-5042
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)
  • 9