中国介入心脏病学杂志2024,Vol.32Issue(3) :141-146.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2024.03.003

使用二代冷冻球囊消融右下肺静脉难易程度的影响因素

Factors influencing ablation of right inferior pulmonary vein using second-generation cryoballoon

张坤 孙光瑶 白金龙 王沛泽 方丕华
中国介入心脏病学杂志2024,Vol.32Issue(3) :141-146.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2024.03.003

使用二代冷冻球囊消融右下肺静脉难易程度的影响因素

Factors influencing ablation of right inferior pulmonary vein using second-generation cryoballoon

张坤 1孙光瑶 1白金龙 1王沛泽 1方丕华1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 泰达国际心血管病医院心内科,天津 300457
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析心房颤动(房颤)使用二代冷冻球囊消融时影响右下肺静脉消融难易程度的因素.方法 回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年3月在泰达国际心血管病医院首次使用二代冷冻球囊消融治疗房颤的患者234例,所有患者术前均己完善左心房CT血管造影(CTA)检查,收集其肺静脉内径(长径、短径)、内径比、测量右下肺静脉角度(下向角度、后向角度)、肺间距、开口高度、早分支情况等,根据右下肺静脉冷冻次数是否≥3次,分为容易组和困难组.结果 纳入234例患者,年龄(62.8±8.1)岁,女性87例(37.2%),阵发性房颤164例(70.1%),困难组56例,容易组178例.所有患者均实现肺静脉隔离,容易组患者右下肺静脉冷冻的最低温度更低[(-48.0±6.2)℃比(-44.6±6.5)℃,P<0.001)],肺静脉电位实时记录率更高(49.4%比33.9%,P=0.042);困难组患者,早期病例(2019年度病例)的比例更高(46.4%比19.7%,P<0.001);容易组与困难组患者右下肺静脉下向成角差异有统计学意义[(59.5±12.3)°比(65.1±14.6)°,P=0.005];内径、内径比、两肺间距、开口高度、后向成角、早分支等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).纳入上述解剖因素和是否早期病例进行Logistic回归分析,下向成角和早期病例是影响肺静脉消融难易程度的独立危险因素(OR 0.968,95%CI 0.943~0.993,P=0.013;OR 0.285,95%CI 0.143~0.565,P=0.001).受试者工作特征曲线显示,使用下向成角预测右下肺静脉封堵困难的曲线下面积0.745(95%CI 0.668~0.822,P<0.001),最佳截断值63.5°,敏感度67.9%,特异度71.9%.结论 在冷冻消融术中,右下肺静脉的下向成角和术者的手术熟练度是影响手术难易程度的主要因素.

Abstract

Objective To analyze factors that affect the difficulty of ablation of right inferior pulmonary vein(RIPV)in atrial fibrillation(AF)using second-generation cryoballoon ablation(CB2).Methods A total of 234 patients with atrial fibrillation who were first treated with CB2 ablation from June 2019 to March 2022 in TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.All patients had completed CT angiography(CTA)of the left atrium before ablation,Anatomical characteristics including PV max diameter,PV minimum diameter,PV ovality,PV angle(downward,backward),interval length of P Vs,PV height,and early branchings were collected.A difficult PV was defined as the requirement for three or more than three times cooling applications or touch-up ablation to achieve pulmonary vein isolation(PVI).Results A total of 234 patients[(62.8±8.1)years,87(37.2%)females,164(70.1%)paroxysmal AF]were divided into two groups,56 in the difficult group,and 178 in the easy group.There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups(all P>0.05).PVI was achieved in all PVs.Nadir temperature during ablation[(-48.0±6.2)℃ vs.(-44.6±6.5)℃,P<0.001]and the real-time recording rate of pulmonary vein potential(PVP)(49.4%vs.33.9%,P=0.042)were better in the easy group than the difficult group.In the difficult group,the proportion of early cases(cases in 2019)was higher(46.4%vs.19.7%,P<0.001);PV downward angle was[(59.5±12.3)° vs.(65.1±14.6)°,P=0.005]in easy group and difficult group respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of PV diameter,PV ovality,PV backward angle(downward),interval length of PVs,PV height,and early branchings,etc.(all P>0.05).Logistic regression analysis conducted by incorporating the above anatomical factors and ablation period(cases in 2019)showed that downward angulation and early cases were independent risk factors affecting ablation difficulty(OR 0.968,95%CI 0.943~0.993,P=0.013;OR 0.285,95%CI 0.143~0.565,P=0.001).The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under curve for predicting the difficulty of RIPV occlusion was 0.745,with 95%CI of 0.668 to 0.822,P<0.001.The optimal cutoff value was 63.5°,sensitivity was 67.9%,and specificity was 71.9%.Conclusions Downward angulation of RIPV had significant effect on the difficulty of ablation,while proficiency of the operator was an important factor.

关键词

心房颤动/冷冻消融/解剖

Key words

Atrial fibrillation/Cryoballoon ablation/Pulmonary vein anatomy

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目(TJYXZDXK-020A)

出版年

2024
中国介入心脏病学杂志
北京大学

中国介入心脏病学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.224
ISSN:1004-8812
参考文献量20
段落导航相关论文