首页|医院血流感染病原菌分布构成及MALDI-TOF MS在快速鉴定病原菌中的价值分析

医院血流感染病原菌分布构成及MALDI-TOF MS在快速鉴定病原菌中的价值分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨医院血流感染病原菌种类及基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱仪(MALDI-TOF MS)技术在病原菌快速识别中的应用.方法 收集2022-2023年本院血流感染患者的血培养阳性标本234份,对分离出的病原菌进行种类鉴定及药敏试验.通过细胞分离液(Percoll液)密度梯度离心法(简称Percoll分离法)与十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)沉淀法联合MALDI-TOF MS法直接鉴定提取物,将鉴定结果与传统血培养结果进行比较,对比两种不同前处理方式联合MALDI-TOF MS对病原菌的鉴定效率.结果 在234份血培养阳性标本中,主要分离自消化科病房(21.37%,50/234),其次为呼吸科病房(14.10%,33/234).从234份血培养阳性标本中分离出234株病原菌,包括177株革兰阴性菌(75.64%)和57株革兰阳性菌(24.36%).在革兰阴性菌中,大肠埃希菌103株(44.02%),占比最高,其次为肺炎克雷伯菌44株(18.80%).革兰阳性菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌23株(9.83%),占比最高,其他菌株数量较少.大肠埃希菌对氨苄西林/舒巴坦、头孢呋辛、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、复方新诺明、庆大霉素耐药率超50%,对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、美罗培南、亚胺培南、阿米卡星耐药率低于10%.肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢呋辛、环丙沙星耐药率超50%,对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、美罗培南、亚胺培南、阿米卡星耐药率低于10%.两者对氨苄西林/舒巴坦、复方新诺明、庆大霉素耐药率差异显著(P<0.05),而对其他抗生素耐药率差异不显著(P>0.05).金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素G等耐药率超50%,对莫西沙星等耐药率较低,未发现对利奈唑胺、万古霉素耐药.与传统培养法对比,Percoll分离法联合MALDI-TOF MS快速鉴定的准确率为93.59%,革兰阴性菌鉴定结果准确率为94.92%,革兰阳性菌鉴定结果准确率为89.47%.SDS沉淀法联合MALDI-TOF MS快速鉴定的准确率为76.5%,革兰阴性菌鉴定结果准确率为80.23%,革兰阳性菌鉴定结果准确率为64.91%.Percoll分离法联合MALDI-TOF MS快速鉴定的病原菌的准确率显著高于SDS沉淀法联合MALDI-TOF MS,其中对革兰阴性菌、革兰阳性菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、人葡萄球菌的鉴定准确率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 本研究血流感染阳性标本主要分离自消化科病房,大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌为主要病原菌,其耐药性监测显示对常见抗生素存在不同程度耐药.Percoll分离法联合MALDI-TOF MS快速鉴定的病原菌的准确率显著优于SDS沉淀法,为临床快速、准确诊断血流感染提供了有力支持.
Distribution and composition of pathogenic bacteria causing bloodstream infections in a hospital and analysis of the value of MALDI-TOF MS in rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria
Objective To explore the types of pathogenic bacteria causing bloodstream infections in a hospital and the application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry(MALDI-TOF MS)technology in the rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria.Methods A total of 234 positive blood culture specimens from patients with bloodstream infections in our hospital from 2022 to 2023 were collected.The types of pathogenic bacteria isolated were identified and drug susceptibility tests were performed.The extract was directly identified by the combined method of density gradient centrifugation with cell separation solution(Percoll solution)(referred to as Percoll separation method)and sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS)precipitation method and MALDI-TOF MS.The identification results were compared with traditional blood culture results to compare the identification efficiency of pathogenic bacteria by two different pretreatment methods combined with MALDI-TOF MS.Results Among the 234 positive blood culture specimens,the majority were mainly isolated from the gastroenterology ward(21.37%,50/234),followed by the respiratory ward(14.10%,33/234).A total of 234 pathogenic bacteria were isolated from 234 positive blood culture specimens,including 177 Gram-negative bacteria(75.64%)and 57 Gram-positive bacteria(24.36%).Among the Gram-negative bacteria,there were 103 strains of Escherichia coli(44.02%),accounting for the highest proportion,followed by 44 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae(18.80%).Among the Gram-positive bacteria,there were 23 strains of Staphylococcus aureus(9.83%),accounting for the highest proportion,and the number of other strains was relatively small.The resistance rate of Escherichia coli to ampicillin/sulbactam,cefuroxime,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,cotrimoxazole,and gentamicin exceeded 50%.The resistance rate to piperacillin/tazobactam,meropenem,imipenem,and amikacin was less than 10%.The resistance rate of K.pneumoniae to cefuroxime and ciprofloxacin exceeded 50%.The resistance rate to piperacillin/tazobactam,meropenem,imipenem,and amikacin was less than 10%.There was a significant difference in the resistance rate of the two to ampicillin/sulbactam,cotrimoxazole,and gentamicin(P<0.05),while there was no significant difference in the resistance rate to other antibiotics(P>0.05).The resistance rate of S.aureus to penicillin G and others exceeded 50%,and the resistance rate to moxifloxacin and others was relatively low.No resistance to linezolid and vancomycin had been found.Compared with the traditional culture method,the accuracy rate of rapid identification by Percoll separation method combined with MALDI-TOF MS was 93.59%.The accuracy rate of identification results of Gram-negative bacteria was 94.92%,and the accuracy rate of identification results of Gram-positive bacteria was 89.47%.The accuracy rate of rapid identification by SDS precipitation method combined with MALDI-TOF MS was 76.5%.The accuracy rate of identification results of Gram-negative bacteria was 80.23%,and the accuracy rate of identification results of Gram-positive bacteria was 64.91%.The accuracy rate of rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria by Percoll separation method combined with MALDI-TOF MS was significantly higher than that by SDS precipitation method combined with MALDI-TOF MS.The differences in the identification accuracy rates of Gram-negative bacteria,Gram-positive bacteria,K.pneumoniae,and S.hominis were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The positive specimens of bloodstream infection in our hospital were mainly isolated from the gastroenterology ward.E.coli and K.pneumoniae were the main pathogenic bacteria.The drug resistance monitoring showed different degrees of resistance to common antibiotics.The accuracy of rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria by Percoll separation method combined with MALDI-TOF MS was significantly better than that by SDS precipitation method,providing strong support for rapid and accurate clinical diagnosis of bloodstream infection.

Bloodstream infectionpathogenic bacteriacell separation methodsodium dodecyl sulfate precipitation methodmatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

肖铟、刘沫然

展开 >

齐齐哈尔医学院附属第三医院肿瘤一科,黑龙江 齐齐哈尔 161000

齐齐哈尔医学院附属第三医院检验中心

血流感染 病原菌 细胞分离法 十二烷基硫酸钠沉淀法 基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱

2025

中国病原生物学杂志
中华预防医学会,山东省寄生虫病防治研究所

中国病原生物学杂志

北大核心
影响因子:1.219
ISSN:1673-5234
年,卷(期):2025.20(1)