首页|后路内镜椎间盘切除凝胶囊富血小板血浆置入

后路内镜椎间盘切除凝胶囊富血小板血浆置入

Posterior endoscopic discectomy combined with intervertebral implantation of platelet-rich plasma capsule

扫码查看
[目的]评价经皮内镜经椎板间椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy,PEID)联合富血小板血浆(platelet rich plasma,PRP)凝胶囊治疗腰椎间盘突出症(lumbar disc herniation,LDH)的临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2018年3月—2020年2月PEID治疗LDH的87例患者的临床资料,依据术前医患沟通结果,45例接受PEID联合PRP凝胶囊治疗(PRP组),42例仅行PEID治疗(无PRP组).经倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM),PRP组30例,无PRP组30例列入本研究.比较两组围手术期、随访及影像学资料.[结果]两组手术时间、切口总长度、术中失血量、术中透视次数、下地行走时间、切口愈合等级及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访时间平均(27.2±2.0)个月,两组完全负重活动时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).随时间推移,两组VAS、ODI与JOA评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05).术后6个月,PRP 组在腰痛 VAS[(1.9±0.8)vs(2.5±0.8),P<0.05]、腿痛 VAS[(2.6±0.9)vs(3.1±0.9),P<0.05]、ODI[(24.5±8.0)vs(29.5±8.3),P<0.05]与JOA评分[(22.2±2.2)vs(21.0±2.1),P<0.05]均显著优于无PRP组.影像方面,随着时间推移,两组的硬膜囊横截面积(du-ral sac cross-sectional surface area,DCSA)、椎间盘高度指数(disc height index,DHI)、髓核与脑脊液信号强度比(signal intensity ratio,SIR)均显著改善(P<0.05).末次随访时,PRP 组在 DCSA[(215.6±12.9)mm2 vs(208.3±13.2)mm2,P=0.034]、Pfirrmann 评级[Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ/Ⅳ/Ⅴ,(0/0/23/7/0)vs(0/0/15/11/4),P=0.037]和 SIR[(24.6±2.3)%vs(23.0±3.3)%,P=0.033]均显著优于无 PRP 组.[结论]PEID联合PRP凝胶囊治疗LDH患者临床疗效确切且应用安全,一定程度上可延缓椎间盘的退变.
[Objective]To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy(PEID)combined with in-tervertebral implantation of platelet-rich plasma capsule for lumbar disc herniation(LDH).[Methods]A retrospective study was performed on 87 patients who received PEID for LDH from March 2018 to February 2020.According to the preoperative doctor-patient communica-tion,45 patients received PEID combined with PRP capsule(the PRP group),while other 42 patients received PEID alone(the non-PRP group).By propensity score matching(PSM),30 patients in the PRP group and 30 patients in the non-PRP were included in this study.The perioperative period,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]There were no significant differences in opera-tion time,total incision length,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,walking time,incision healing grade and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).The follow-up period lasted for(27.2±2.0)months on a mean,and there was no significant difference in time to resume full weight-bearing activity between the two groups(P>0.05).The VASs,ODI and JOA score were significantly improved over time in both groups(P<0.05).At 6 months postoperatively,the PRP group proved significantly superior to the non-PRP group in terms of low back pain VAS[(1.9±0.8)vs(2.5±0.8),P<0.05],leg pain VAS[(2.6±0.9)vs(3.1±0.9),P<0.05],ODI[(24.5±8.0)vs(29.5±8.3),P<0.05]and JOA score[(22.2±2.2)vs(21.0±2.1),P<0.05].Radiographically,the dural sac cross-sectional surface area(DCSA),disc height in-dex(DHI),and signal intensity ratio(SIR)between nucleus pulposus and cerebrospinal fluid were significantly improved in both group over time(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,the PRP group were significantly better than non-PRPgroup in terms of DCSA[(215.6±12.9)mm2 vs(208.3±13.2)mm2,P=0.034],Pfirrmann grade of disc degeneration[Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ/Ⅳ/Ⅴ,(0/0/23/7/0)vs(0/0/15/11/4),P=0.037],and SIR[(24.6± 2.3)%vs(23.0±3.3)%,P=0.033].[Conclusion]The PEID combined with PRP capsule is effective and safe in the treatment of LDH,and might delay the degeneration of intervertebral disc to a certain extent.

lumbar disc herniationposterior endoscopic discectomyplatelet-rich plasmapropensity score matching

李土胜、丁宇、蒋强、张晗硕、杜薇、刘江

展开 >

解放军总医院第六医学中心中医医学部骨伤科,北京 100048

南方医科大学第二临床医学院,广东广州 510515

腰椎间盘突出症 后路内镜椎间盘切除术 富血小板血浆 倾向性评分匹配

首都临床诊疗技术研究及示范应用项目

Z191100006619028

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(3)
  • 25