首页|中上胸椎3D打印导板引导与徒手椎弓根钉置入比较

中上胸椎3D打印导板引导与徒手椎弓根钉置入比较

3D printed guide assisted versus freehand pedicle screw fixation of upper and middle thoracic spine fractures

扫码查看
[目的]评价3D打印导板辅助中上胸椎椎弓根钉置入准确性和意义.[方法]回顾性分析本院2019年12月-2022年12月手术治疗的中上胸椎骨折50例患者的临床资料.依据术前医患沟通结果,25例采用3D打印导板辅助置钉(导板组),25例采用传统徒手置钉(徒手组).比较两组围手术期、随访及影像资料.[结果]50例手术均顺利完成,术中未出现主动脉、胸髓及神经根损伤.导板组透视次数[(2.8±1.2)次vs(9.5±2.7)次,P<0.001]、单钉置入时间[(2.2±0.5)min vs(3.5±0.7)min,P<0.001]、一次置钉成功率(100.0%vs 90.7%,P<0.001)均显著优于徒手组,但前者的医疗费用显著高于后者[(35 221.4±423.2)元vs(34 358.5±442.9)元,P<0.001].两组手术时间、切口总长度、术中出血量、住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).随访时间(16.8±3.4)个月,随时间推移,两组VAS评分、ODI指数、JOA评分及ASIA神经评级均显著改善(P<0.05),相应时间点,两组间上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后影像评估,导板组置钉精准率[(0/Ⅰ/Ⅱ),(146/4/0)vs(122/23/5),P<0.001]显著优于徒手组,末次随访两组病例均骨性愈合,均无内固定物松动、断钉等.[结论]3D打印导板辅助下行中上胸椎螺钉置入,提高了椎弓根钉置入的精准性,患者射线暴露少,安全性更高.
[Objective]To evaluate the accuracy and significance of 3D printed guide assisted pedicle screw placement for fixation of the upper and middle thoracic spine fractures.[Methods]A retrospective study was performed on 50 patients who underwent surgical treat-ment for upper and middle thoracic spine fractures from December 2019 to December 2022.According to preoperative doctor-patient com-munication,25 patients had screw placed by the 3D printed guides(the guide group),while the remaining 25 patients were managed by tradi-tional freehand technique(the freehand group).The perioperative,follow-up and imaging data of the two groups were compared.[Results]All the 50 patients were successfully operated without injuries to aorta,thoracic pulp and nerve root.The guide group proved significantly su-perior to the freehand group in terms of intraoperative fluoroscopy times[(2.8±1.2)times vs(9.5±2.7)times,P<0.001],time of single screw placement[(2.2±0.5)min vs(3.5±0.7)min,P<0.001],success rate of first time screw placement(100.0%vs 90.7%,P<0.001),whereas the former consumed significantly higher medical fee than the latter[(35 221.4±423.2)yuan vs(34 358.5±442.9)yuan,P<0.001].However,there were no significant differences in operation time,total incision length,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).As time went on in follow-up period lasted for(16.8±3.4)months,the VAS,ODI and JOA scores,as well as ASIA neurologi-cal function classification significantly improved in both groups(P<0.05),whereas which were not statistically significant between the two groups at any time points accordingly(P>0.05).As result of postoperative imaging evaluation,the guide group was also proved significantly superior to the freehand group regarding screw placement accuracy[(0/Ⅰ/Ⅱ),(146/4/0)vs(122/23/5),P<0.001].At the last follow-up,all pa-tients in both groups got fracture healing without loosening of internal implants.[Conclusion]The 3D printed guide assisted pedicle screw placement for fixation of the upper and middle thoracic spine fractures does improves the accuracy with less radiation exposure and higher safety.

upper and middle thoracic spine fracturespedicle screw fixation3D printingguide

姜泽威、李志恒、金海龙、汤舒婷、周纪平、王东、丛波、刘彬、吴瑞、李佳佳、张廷伟、杨凯、严伟、席焱海、谭明生

展开 >

山东省文登整骨医院,山东威海 264400

安徽省淮南市寿县中医院,安徽淮南 232200

海军军医大学第二附属医院,上海 200000

中日友好医院,北京 100020

展开 >

中上胸椎骨折 椎弓根螺钉固定 3D打印 导板

国家中医药局骨伤整复重点研究项目

2024

中国矫形外科杂志
中国残疾人康复协会 中国人民解放军第八十八医院

中国矫形外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.521
ISSN:1005-8478
年,卷(期):2024.32(5)
  • 18